Guidelines for the use of non-standard road signs - Polish experiences

Authors

  • Alessandro Calvi Department of Engineering, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy
  • Stanisław Gaca Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland
  • Tomasz Kamiński Motor Transport Institute, Transport Telematics Center, Warsaw, Poland
  • Mariusz Kieć Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland
  • Mikołaj Kruszewski Motor Transport Institute, Transport Telematics Center, Warsaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.136483

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present the procedure of non-standard road signs and markings implementation in Poland to improve road safety and traffic performance of road infrastructure. The authors investigated the following cases: road and its surroundings’ perception and understanding improvement; warning of increased risk of accidents; road works; speed management and ITS. The procedure was developed on the basis of interdisciplinary research, including: observation of drivers behaviour in real traffic; comparative crash analysis on sections with and without non-standard signs or markings; surveys on the understanding signs and marking; driving simulator experiments. As a result of the research, an implementation procedure for non-standard signs and markings, in the form of flowchart, was developed. In the designed procedure the following study of non-standard signs can be distinguished: questionnaire studies, eye tracking tests and driving simulator tests. The choice of the test method depends on the preliminary assessment of sign understanding, based on the results of the questionnaires. Moreover, thresholds for the declared understanding level, which determines the selection of additional tests to be done prior to the implementation of the sign, are given. The guidelines for conducting tests, analysis and monitoring of implementation were described as well.

References

1. E. Arnold, K. Lantz, “Evaluation of Best Practices in Traffic Operations and Safety: Phase I: Flashing LED Stop Sign and Optical Speed Bars”, Final Report, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, (2007).

2. E. D. Hildebrand, F. R. Wilson, J.J. Copeland, “Speed Management Strategies for Rural Temporary Work Zones, Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference XIII”, Banff, Alberta, Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals, (2003).

3. P. Greibe, “Chevron Markings on Freeways: Effect on Speed”, Gap and Safety, 4th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Valencia, Spain, June 2-5, (2010).

4. M. Abuzwidah, M. Abdel-Aty, “Safety assessment of the conversion of toll plazas to all-electronic toll collection system”, Accident Analysis and Prevention 80: 153-161, (2015).

5. F. Gross, R. Jagannathan, W. Huges, “Two low-cost safety concepts for two-way STOP-controlled intersections”, Transportation Research Record 2092: 11-18, (2009).

6. S. Charlton, “The role of attention in horizontal curves: A comparison of advance warning, delineation, and road marking treatments:, Accident Analysis and Prevention 39: 873-885, (2007).

7. F. Quon, D. Warren, “Best Practices in Arterial Speed Management”, final report. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (2009).

8. S. Hallmark, S. Knickerbocker, N. Hawkins, “Evaluation of Low Cost Traffic Calming for Rural Communities - Phase II”, Trans Project Reports. Paper 94, (2003).

9. A. Calvi. Investigating the effectiveness of perceptual treatments on a crest vertical curve: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, (2018), Vol. 58, pp. 1074-1086. doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.002.

10. A. Calvi, F. D’Amico, L. Bianchini Ciampoli, C. Ferrante. Evaluating the effectiveness of perceptual treatments on sharp curves: a driving simulator study. Traffic Injury Prevention, (2019), Vol. 20(2), pp. 13-19. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1669789.

11. A. Calvi, F. D’Amico, C. Ferrante, L. Bianchini Ciampoli, F. Tosti. Applying perceptual treatments for reducing operating speeds on curves: a driving simulator study for investigating driver’s speed behaviour. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (2020), Vol. 964, pp. 330-340. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_31.

12. S. Lee, K. Lee, S. Kim, “Effectiveness of the Peripheral Transverse Line as Speed-Reduction Treatment on Korean Expressway Ramps”, International Journal of Highway Engineering Vol.14 No.6: 85-92, (2012).

13. A. Montella, M. Ariab, A. D’Ambrosiob, F. Galantea, F. Maurielloa, M. Pernettic, “Simulator evaluation of drivers’ speed, deceleration and lateral position at rural intersections in relation to different perceptual cues”, Accident Analysis and Prevention 43: 2072-2084, (2011).

14. C. Borello, S. Ortniz, “Dynamic Message Sign Influence on Driver Performance”, ITE 2010 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Vancouver, (2010).

15. R. Tay, A. De Barros, “Effectiveness of Road Safety Messages on Variable Messages Signs”, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3: 18-23, (2010).

16. ISO 9186-1:2011, Graphical symbols - Test methods.

17. S. Gaca, S. Pogodzinska, A. Wontorczyk, “Study of effectiveness of experimental marking and signs in speed management”, MATEC Web of Conferences 231, 02004, (2018).

18. M. Kieć, M. Tracz, S. Gaca, “Design of cross-section on roads through built-up areas”, Archives of Civil Engineering, (2012), 58(3), 243-257. doi:10.2478/v.10169-012-0015-y.

19. S. Gaca, M. Kiec, S. Pogodzinska, A. Wontorczyk, “Impact of Toll Plazas Road Marking and Signs on Drivers’ Behaviour”. MATEC Web of Conferences 231, 02003, (2018).

20. M. Kruszewski, M. Ucińska, E. Smoczyńska, P. Budziszewski, A. Grabowski, “Experimental road signs in a simulated environment research programme - experiment procedures and assumptions”, MATEC Web of Conferences 122, 04003 (2017).

21. R.S. Kennedy, N.E. Lane, K.S. Berbaum, M.G. Lilienthal, “A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness”, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2003, 3(3), 203-220.

22. ANSI Z535.3, 2011, Criteria for Safety Symbols National Electrical Manufacturers Association.

23. ISO 3864-1:2011. Graphical symbols - Safety colours and safety signs.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30

How to Cite

Calvi, Alessandro, et al. “Guidelines for the Use of Non-Standard Road Signs - Polish Experiences”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 461-79, doi:10.24425/ace.2021.136483.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.