Integrated analysis of costs and amount of greenhouse gases emissions during the building lifecycle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.137176

Abstract

More than 6 billion square metres of new buildings are built each year. This is about 1.2 million buildings. If we translate these figures into carbon footprint (CF) generated during the construction, it will be approximately 3.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide. The contractors all over the world - also in Poland - decide to calculate the carbon footprint for various reasons, but mostly they are compelled to do so by the market. The analysis of costs and emissions of greenhouse gases for individual phases of the construction system allows implementing solutions and preventing a negative impact on the environment without increasing the construction costs. The share of each phase in the amount of produced carbon for construction and use of the building depends mainly on the used materials and applied design solutions. Hence, the materials and solutions with lesser carbon footprint should be used. It can be achieved by using natural materials or materials which do not need much energy to be produced. The author will attempt to outline this idea and present examples of integrated analysis of costs and amount of carbon footprint during the building lifecycle.

References

[1] A. Dziadosz, O. Kapliński, M. Rejment, “Łączne koszty budynku w cyklu życia inwestycji budowlanej”, Wybrane problemy budownictwa. ed. A. Podchorecki, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy w Bydgoszczy, Bydgoszcz, 127-134, 2015.

[2] S. Eleftheriadis, P. Duffour, P. Greening, J. James, B. Stephenson, D. Mumovic, “Investigating relationships between cost and CO2 emissions in reinforced concrete structures using a BIM-based design optimisation approach”, Energy & Buildings, 166: 330-346, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.059

[3] A. Greinert, M. Mrówczyńska, W. Szefner, “The Use of Waste Biomass from the Wood Industry and Municipal Sources for Energy Production”, Sustainability, 11: 3083, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113083

[4] B. Grzyl, E. Miszewska-Urbańska, M. Apollo, “The life cycle cost of a building from the point of view of environmental criteria of selecting the most beneficial offer in the area of competitive tendering”, E3S Web of Conferences 17: 00028, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171700028

[5] M. Ilic, M. Nikolic, “Drivers for development of circular economy - A case study of Serbia”, Habitat International, 56: 191-200, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.003

[6] ISO 14067: “Carbon footprint of products - requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication”

[7] M. Kośmieja, J. Pasławski, “A flexible approach to the evaluation of the cost effectiveness of investment projects”, Technical Transactions 9: 91-98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.17.150.7162

[8] D. Li, H. Chen, E. C. Hui, J. Zhang and Q. Li, "A Methodology for Estimating the Life-Cycle Carbon Efficiency of a Residential Building," Building and Environment, 59: 448-455, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.012

[9] M. Lieder, A. Rashid, “Towards Circular Economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 115: 36-51, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042

[10] P. Mesároš, T. Mandičák, M. Spišáková, “Sustainability trough BIM technology in construction industry”, Proceedings of 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, 18: 531-536, 2018.

[11] P. Nuñez-Cacho, J. Górecki, V. Molina-Moreno, F. A. Corpas-Iglesias, “What Gets Measured, Gets Done: Development of a Circular Economy Measurement Scale for Building Industry”, Sustainability, 10: 2340, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072340

[12] E. Plebankiewicz, W. Meszek, K. Zima, D. Wieczorek, “Probabilistic and fuzzy approaches for estimating the life cycle costs of buildings under conditions of exposure to risk”, Sustainability, 12: 226, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010226

[13] E. Plebankiewicz, K. Zima, D. Wieczorek, “Scenarios for Maintenance and Building Decommissioning in the Building’s Life Cycle”, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 222: 012015, 2019.

[14] A. Ruuska (ed.), “Carbon footprint for building products. ECO2 data for materials and products with the focus on wooden building products”, VTT Technology 115, Espoo Finland , 2013.

[15] J. Solís-Guzmán, C. Rivero-Camacho, D. Alba-Rodríguez, A. Martínez-Rocamora, “Carbon Footprint Estimation Tool for Residential Buildings for Non-Specialized Users: OERCO2 Project”, Sustainability, 10: 1359, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051359

[16] J. Svajlenka, M. Kozlovska, M. Spisakova, “The benefits of modern method of construction based on wood in the context of sustainability”, International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 14: 1591-1602, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1282-6

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Zima, Krzysztof. “Integrated Analysis of Costs and Amount of Greenhouse Gases Emissions During the Building Lifecycle”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 413-2, doi:10.24425/ace.2021.137176.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.