Risk analysis in the environmental impact assessment of building construction innovations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.138510

Abstract

Buildings in Poland are still constructed using technologies and methods created decades ago, even though many new technologies can be applied. Such an approach in the construction process is not sufficient to ensure the sustainable development of the world. Therefore, there is a great need for implementing new, innovative technical, economic, and social solutions. Innovation can be considered as any change that is beneficial for the entity that introduces it. The challenges that the construction sector faces nowadays are mostly related to the concept of sustainable development. The main trends in innovations are the shift towards more resource- and energy-efficientways of construction aswell as implementing the principles of the circular economy. In this article, we present innovative technologies applied in the construction sector that meet the requirements of sustainable development. Also, we propose a method for assessing the environmental impact of innovative technologies currently used in the construction sector. As the proposed methods are primarily based on expert knowledge, it was necessary to determine the risk of making a wrong decision to apply innovative technology in practice based on an assessment made by a person with appropriate competencies.

References

[1] S. Firląg, et al., “Główne aspekty środowiskowe związane z budynkami biurowymi”, in Zrównoważone budynki biurowe, PWN, Warsaw, Poland, 2018.

[2] A. Kaliszuk-Wietecka and A. Węglarz, “Nowoczesne budynki energoefektywne”. Polcen, 2019.

[3] J. Bizoń-Górecka, “Innowacje w budownictwie i ich ryzyko”. Przegląd Budowlany, vol. 78, pp. 43-47, 2007.

[4] A. Węglarz and M. Pierzchalski, “Comparing construction technologies of single family housing with regard of minimizing embodied energy and embodied carbon”. E3S Web of Conferences 49, 2018.

[5] A. Sapińska-Oeliwa, et al., “Porównanie metod oceny oddziaływania budynków na środowisko - wkład Laboratorium Geoenergetyki Wydziału Wiertnictwa, Nafty i Gazu AGH w rozwój metodologii”. Energy Policy Journal, vol. 17, no. 11, 2014.

[6] A. Panek, “Holistyczna metoda oceny oddziaływania obiektów budowlanych na środowisko naturalne uwzględniająca zasady rozwoju zrównoważonego - raport końcowy projektu 8 T07G”, Poland, 2005.

[7] K. Martinek-Jaguszewska, “Zarządzanie ryzykiem w procesie wdrażania innowacyjnych usług - przegląd literatury i konceptualizacja modelu”. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów/Szkoła Główna Handlowa, vol. 151, 2016.

[8] V. Singh, “BIM and systemic ICT innovation in AEC: Perceived needs and actor’s degrees of freedom”. Construction Innovation, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 292-306, 2014, DOI: 10.1108/CI-02-2013-0006.

[9] G.E. Gürcanli and U. Müngen, “An occupational safety risk analysis method at construction sites using fuzzy sets”. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 371-387, 2009, DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon. 2008.10.006.

[10] X. Xue, et al., “Innovation in construction: A critical review and future research”. International Journal of Innovation Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111-125, 2014, DOI: 10.1260/1757-2223.6.2.111.

[11] A.R. Fayek and K. Hampson, “Leveraging Innovation for Sustainable Construction”. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 58, pp. 18-19, 2009.

[12] P. Dewick and M. Miozzo, “Sustainable technologies and the innovation - regulation paradox”. Futures, vol. 34, no. 9-10, pp. 823-840, 2002, DOI: 10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00029-0.

[13] P. Davis, et al., “Assessing construction innovation: theoretical and practical perspectives”. Construction Economics and Building, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 104-115, 2016.

[14] Autodesk, “Budownictwo innowacyjne. Wizja liderów branży 2025”. Report, Poland, 2019.

[15] M. Krechowicz, “Metodyka zarządzania ryzykiem w budownictwie podziemnym infrastruktury miast”. Przegląd Organizacji, vol. 4, pp. 28-37, 2020.

[16] U. Kulatunga, D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh, “Construction innovation: a literature review on current research”. University of Huddersfield, Reprints, United Kingdom, 2006.

[17] B. Ozorhon, et al., “Innovation in construction: a project life cycle approach”. Salford Centre for Research and Innovation in the Built Environment (SCRI) Research Report, vol. 4, pp. 903-1012, 2010.

[18] “10 innovative construction materials that could revolutionise the industry.” [online]. Available: https://www.letsbuild.com/blog/10-innovative-construction-materials.

[19] “What are new innovations in construction?” [online]. Available: https://www.quora.com/What-are-new-innovations-in-construction.

[20] “10 innovations that have revolutionized construction.” [online]. Available: https://constructible.trimble.com/construction-industry/10-innovations-that-have-revolutionized-construction.

[21] O. Ogunbiyi, A. Oladapo and J. Goulding, “Construction innovation: the implementation of lean construction towards sustainable innovation”. Proceedings of IBEA Conference, Innovation and the Built Environment Academy, 2011.

[22] M. Coccia, “Measuring the impact of sustainable technological innovation”. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, vol. 5, no. 3, 2009, DOI: 10.1504/IJTIP.2009.026749.

[23] L. Nazarko, “Technology assessment in construction sector as a strategy towards sustainability”. Procedia Engineering, vol. 122, pp. 290-295, 2015, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.038.

[24] C. Sjöström, et al., “Sustainable Smart ECO-Buildings”. Proceedings of IBEA Conference, Innovation and the Built Environment Academy, 2011.

[25] S. Mjakuškina, M. Kavosa and I. Lapina, “Achieving Sustainability in the Construction Supervision Process”. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 5, no. 3, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/joitmc5030047.

[26] B. Jefferson, S. Judd, and C. Diaper, “Treatment methods for Grey Water”. Decentralised Sanitation and Reuse: Concepts, Systems and Implementation”. Book, London, UK: IWA, 2001.

[27] P. Narloch and P. Wojciechowski, “Assessing cement stabilized rammed earth durability in a humid continental climate”. Buildings, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-20, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/buildings10020026.

[28] P. Narloch, et al., “Flexural tensile strength of construction elements made out of cement stabilized rammed earth”. Procedia Engineering, vol. 111, pp. 589-595, 2015, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.049.

[29] J. Fangrat and J. Sieczkowski, “Budownictwo innowacyjne”. Builder, vol. 21, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Węglarz, Arkadiusz, and Paweł Gilewski. “Risk Analysis in the Environmental Impact Assessment of Building Construction Innovations”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 4, Dec. 2021, pp. 433-50, doi:10.24425/ace.2021.138510.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.