Selection of “white tub” technology using multi-criteria analysis - a case study

Authors

  • Aleksandra Radziejowska AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics, Cracow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-7129
  • Kazimierz Linczowski AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics, Cracow, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0868-1942

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2022.140179

Keywords

white box technology, white tub technology, multi-criteria analysis, underground part, watertight concrete

Abstract

Currently, more and more investments are carried out in areas with difficult ground conditions, where in addition there may be a high level of groundwater. Therefore, it is necessary to use technologies which ensure the safety of the building in the exploitation phase by, among others, ensuring appropriate leak-tightness of its underground part. The article focuses on presenting the application of watertight concrete system (WCS), also known as "white tub" technology, which is an effective way to protect the underground part of the building against the destructive effects of water. The aim of this paper is to present and analyze selected methods of securing the underground parts of erected buildings using the "white tub" technology. In this paper, the authors analyze and select the solution using a multi-criteria analysis. The presented method will be used on a selected object.

References

[1] J. Bilcik, R. Sonnenschein, K. Gajdosova, “Design and execution of watertight concrete constructions”, Key Engineering Materials, 2016, vol. 691, no. pp. 209-219, 2016; DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.691.209.

[2] R. Al-Rashed, M. Jabari, “Dual-crystallization waterproofing technology for topical treatment of concrete”, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2020, vol. 13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00408.

[3] A. Radziejowska, A. Sobotka, “Comparative analysis of slab formwork of monolithic reinforced concrete buildings”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2020, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 127-141.

[4] M. Rokiel, “Zastosowanie betonu wodonieprzepuszczalnego w tzw. technologii białej wanny - cz. I - Inżynier Budownictwa”, [Online]. Available: https://inzynierbudownictwa.pl/zastosowanie-beton-uwodonieprzepuszczalnego-w-tzw-technologii-bialej-wanny-cz-i/. [Accessed: 07 Jul. 2021].

[5] M. Rokiel, “Zastosowanie betonu wodonieprzepuszczalnego w tzw. technologii białej wanny - cz. II”, Inżynier Budownictwa, 2017, no. 2, pp. 75-79.

[6] A. Radziejowska, K. Zima, “Multicriteria analysis in selecting the optimal variant of solar system”, E3S Web of Conferences, 2016, vol. 10, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20161000078.

[7] T. Saaty, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, 2000.

[8] PN-EN 1992-3:2008/NA:2010 - wersja polska. [Online]. Available: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-1992-3-2008-na-2010p.html. [Accessed: 02 Jun. 2021].

[9] PN-EN 206+A1:2016-12 - wersja angielska. [Online]. Available: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-206-a1-2016-12e.html. [Accessed: 02 Jun. 2021].

[10] B. Francke, Warunki techniczne wykonania i odbioru robót budowlanych, część C Zabezpieczenia i izolacje, zeszyt 12. Części podziemne budynków wykonanych z betonu wodoszczelnego. Uszczelnianie miejsc newralgicznych, Warszawa: ITB, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Radziejowska, Aleksandra, and Kazimierz Linczowski. “Selection of ‘white tub’ Technology Using Multi-Criteria Analysis - a Case Study”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 443-58, doi:10.24425/ace.2022.140179.

Issue

Vol. 68 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.