English
Język Polski
Ocena efektywności komunikacji pomiędzy uczestnikami przedsięwzięcia budowlanego z wykorzystaniem teorii metasieci
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.144175Abstrakt
W artykule zwrócono uwagę na fakt, że przedsięwzięcie budowlane ze względu na swój charakter jest złożone, tymczasowe i dynamiczne. Rozwój przemysłu budowlanego sprawił, iż zwiększyła się świadomość potrzeby lepszego zarządzania przedsięwzięciami w przemyśle budowlanym. W licznych publikacjach wskazano na utrudnienia i wyzwania w zarządzaniu przedsięwzięciami budowlanymi. Zarządzanie przedsięwzięciami budowlanymi w tradycyjnym podejściu skupia się w pierwszej kolejności na planowaniu zadań wraz z przydziałem do nich zasobów odnawialnych (ludzie, sprzęt) i nieodnawialnych (materiały). W czasie trwania realizacji przedsięwzięcia uwaga skoncentrowana jest na organizowaniu i przydziale zasobów do zadań i monitorowaniu ich realizacji wraz z kontrolą ich odchyleń od planu i budżetu a także ewentualnymi działaniami korygującymi. Stosowane przy tym różne techniki zarządzania nie uwzględniają w analizie relacji między uczestnikami przedsięwzięcia budowlanego, a realizowanymi przez nich zadaniami i posiadaną wiedzą. Zauważyć należy, iż takie interakcje między ludźmi, organizacjami, zadaniami są podstawą złożonego systemu komunikacji w przedsięwzięciach budowlanych. Przekłada się to jednocześnie na utrudnioną komunikacje. W literaturze zwraca się uwagę na fakt, że podejście sieciowe do analizy i monitorowania komunikacji w ramach złożonych przedsięwzięć budowlanych jest odpowiednie.Bibliografia
[1] E. Radziszewska-Zielina and B. Sroka, “Priority Scheduling in the Planning of Multiple-Structure Construction Projects”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 21-33, 2017, DOI: 10.1515/ace-2017-0038.
[2] A.N. Baldwin, S.A. Austin, and M.A.P. Murray, “Improving design management in the building industry”, in The design productivity debate, A.H.B. Duffy, ed. London: Springer, 1998, pp. 255-267, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-1538-0_13.
[3] E. Radziszewska-Zielina and E. Kania, “Problems in Carrying Out Construction Projects in Large Urban Agglomerations on the Example of the Construction of the Axis and High5ive Office Buildings in Krakow”, Matec Web of Conferences, vol. 117, art. no. 00144, 2017, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711700144.
[4] K.M. Carley, “Smart agents and organizations of the future”, in The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone, Eds. SAGE, 2002, pp. 206-220, DOI: 10.4135/9781848608245.n16.
[5] E. Radziszewska-Zielina and B. Szewczyk, “Examples of actions that improve partnering cooperation among the participants of construction projects”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 251, no. 1, art. no. 012051, 2017, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/251/1/012051.
[6] E. Radziszewska-Zielina and B. Szewczyk, “Controlling partnering relations in construction operations using fuzzy reasoning”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 89-104, 2015, DOI: 10.1515/ace-2015-0027.
[7] E. Radziszewska-Zielina, “Analysis of the partnering relations of Polish, Slovak and Ukrainian construction enterprises”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 432-454, 2010, DOI: 10.3846/tede.2010.27.
[8] E. Radziszewska-Zielina, “Analysis of the Impact of the Level of Partnering Relations on the Selected Indexes of Success of Polish Construction Enterprises”, Inzinerine Ekonomika - Engineering Economics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 324-335, 2010, https://inzeko.ktu.lt/index.php/EE/article/view/11701.
[9] E. Kania, E. Radziszewska-Zielina, and G. Śladowski, “Communication and Information Flow in Polish Construction Projects”, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, art. no. 9182, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/su12219182.
[10] J. Kisielnicki, “The communication system in project teams: problems of transfer of knowledge and information for the management of IT Projects”, Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, vol. 8, pp. 351-361, 2011, DOI: 10.28945/1423.
[11] J.L. Moreno, Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing, 1934, DOI: 10.1037/10648-000.
[12] M. Loosemore, “Construction crises as periods of social adjustment”, Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 30-37, 1997, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:4(30).
[13] M. Loosemore, “Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 5, no.4, pp. 315-326, 1998, DOI: 10.1108/eb021085.
[14] X. Ruan, E. Ochieng, A. Price, and C. Egbu, “Knowledge integration process in construction projects: a social network analysis approach to compare competitive and collaborative working”, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5-19, 2012, DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2011.654127.
[15] R. Alsamadani, M. Hallowell, and A.N. Javernick-Will, “Measuring and modelling safety communication in small work crews in the US using social network analysis”, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 568-579, 2013, DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2012.685486.
[16] P. Jafari, E. Mohamed, S.H. Lee, and S. Abourizk, “Social network analysis of change management processes for communication assessment”, Automation in Construction, vol. 118, art. no. 103292, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103292.
[17] W. Swan, P. McDermott, and M. Khalfan, “The application of social network analysis to identify trustbased networks in construction”, International Journal Networking and Virtual Organisations, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 369-382, 2007, DOI: 10.1504/IJNVO.2007.015720.
[18] D.R.E. Arriagada and C.L.F. Alarcón, “Knowledge Management and Maturation Model in Construction Companies”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 140, no. 4, 2014, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000726.
[19] R. Trach and S. Bushuyev, “Analysis communication network of construction project participants”, Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 388-396, 2020, DOI: 10.22630/PNIKS.2020.29.3.33.
[20] G. Śladowski, E. Radziszewska-Zielina, and E. Kania, “Analysis of self-organising networks of communication between the participants of a housing complex construction project”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 181-195, 2019, DOI: 10.2478/ace-2019-0013.
[21] E. Radziszewska-Zielina, G. Śladowski, E. Kania, B. Sroka, and B. Szewczyk, “Managing Information Flow in Self-Organising Networks of Communication Between Construction Project Participants”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 133-148, 2019, DOI: 10.2478/ace-2019-0024.
[22] G. Śladowski, “Use of Meta-Networks to Evaluate Key Agents, Knowledge and Resources in the Planning of Construction Projects”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 111-129, 2018, DOI: 10.2478/ace-2018-0033.
[23] Y.K. Li, L.L. Qian, Q.H. He, and Y.F. Duan, “Meta-network Based Fitness Measurement of Projects Organization and Tasks Assignment”, in Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, 2014, pp. 643-655, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35548-6_67.
[24] G. Śladowski, Metasieci w proaktywnym podejściu do planowania rewaloryzacji zabytkowych obiektów budowlanych. Wydawnictwo PK, 2021.
[25] J. Zhu and A. Mostafavi, “Characterization of the underlying mechanisms of vulnerability in complex projects using dynamic network simulation”, in 2017 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2436-2447, DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2017.8247973.
[26] E. Kania, G. Śladowski, E. Radziszewska-Zielina, B. Sroka, and B. Szewczyk, “Planning and monitoring communication between construction project participants”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 455-473, 2021, DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.137179.
[27] E. Kania, G. Śladowski, E. Radziszewska-Zielina, and B. Sroka, “Analysis of the impact of communication between the participants of a construction project on its completion time and cost”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 595-610, 2022, DOI: 10.24425/ace.2022.140188.
[28] D. Krackhardt and K.M. Carley, “PCANS model of structure in organizations”, in Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology. 1998, pp. 113-119.
[29] G. Śladowski, “Using meta-networks to analyse the impact of adverse random events on the time and cost of completing construction work”, Engineering and Environmental Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 192-202, 2019, DOI: 10.22630/PNIKS.2019.28.2.18.
[30] G. Śladowski and B. Sroka, “Construction work cost and duration analysis with the use of agent-based modelling and simulation", Open Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 830-844, 2021, DOI: 10.1515/eng-2021-0081.
[31] J. Reminga and K.M. Carley, Measures for ORA (Organizational Risk Analyzer). Institute for Software Research School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003.
[32] S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social network analysis: Methods and applications, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[33] S. Borgatti and M. Everett, “Network analysis of 2-mode data”, Social Networks, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 243-269, 1997, DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2.
[34] L.C. Freeman, “Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification”, Social Networks, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215-239, 1979, DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
[35] M. Ashworth and K.M. Carley, “Who you know vs. what you know: The impact of social position and knowledge on team performance”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 43-75, 2006, DOI: 10.1080/00222500500323101.
[36] D. Dekker, K.M. Carley, and D. Krackhardt, “How do social networks affect organizational knowledge utilization?”. Project Network Measures, 2002.
[37] S. Pryke, et al., “Self-organizing networks in complex infrastructure projects”, Project Management Journal, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 18-41, 2018, DOI: 10.1177/875697281804900202.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
