Use of DMT and CPTU tests in the evaluation of shear modulus G0 for soils of different origin

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.144187

Abstract

The subject of this article is the analysis of the relationship between G0/MDMT and KD, where G0 is the small strain shear modulus, while MDMT and KD are respectively the constrained modulus and the horizontal stress index determined from DMT tests. This relationship allows to determine a profile with depth of G0 from standard DMT test results, useful when data from non-seismic DMT investigations are available. The analysis was based on a large amount of data for a wide range of soils of different origins in Poland. The dataset included OC and NC loams, silts, medium sands, silty sands and fine sands. The overconsolidation ratio (OCR) was estimated using data from CPTU and DMT tests. The obtained empirical G0/MDMT vs. KD relationships were compared with the correlations established by Marchetti et al. [1] for different soil types. To account for the significant influence of overconsolidation, an original empirical relationship between G0/σ'p and KD, where σ'p is the preconsolidation stress, was defined based on data from all investigated fine-grained soils.

References

[1] S. Marchetti, P. Monaco, G. Tonani, and D. Marchetti, “In-situ Tests by Seismic Dilatometer (SDMT)”, in Proc. From Research to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering. GSP 180, J.E. Laier, et al., Eds. New Orleans: ASCE, 2008, pp. 292-311, DOI: 10.1061/40962(325)7.

[2] Z. Młynarek, “Quality of In-Situ and Laboratory Tests Contribution to Risk Management”, in Proc. 14th Danube European Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, 2-4 June, Bratislava, Slovakia. 2010.

[3] G. Bartnik, R. Kuszyk, and M. Superczyńska, “Strengthening of the soft soil loaded with heavy construction traffic based on dilatometer tests”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 559-572, 2021, DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.138518.

[4] S. Lacasse and F. Nadim, “Relability issues and future challenges in geotechnical engineering for offshore structures”, in Proc. 7th International Conference on Behaviour of Offshore Structures, Cambridge, MA, USA, 12-15 Jul 1994, no. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994, pp. 1-48.

[5] Z. Młynarek, K. Stefaniak, and J. Wierzbicki, “Geotechnical parameters of alluvial soils from in-situ tests”, Archives of Hydro-Engineering and Environmental Mechanics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 3-22, 2012.

[6] J. Powell, “In-situ testing, General report”, in Proc. of 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 12-16 September, Osaka. Rotterdam: Millpress, 2005, pp. 2971-2981, DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-656-9-2971.

[7] J. Wierzbicki, Evaluation of subsoil overconsolidation by means of in situ tests at the aspect of its origin. Scientific dissertations, no. 410. Poznan University of Life Sciences, 2010.

[8] G. Wrzesiński, “Anisotropy of soil shear strength parameters caused by the principal stress rotation”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2021, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 163-187, 2021, DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.136467.

[9] S. Marchetti, “In-situ tests by flat dilatometer”, ASCE Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, vol. 100, pp. 299-321, 1980.

[10] H. Langhaar, Dimensional analysis and theory of models. New York: John Wiley&Sons, London, 1964.

[11] S. H. H. Lee and K. H. Stoke, “Investigation of low amplitude shear wave velocity in anisotropics materials”, Geotechnical Report No. GR 86-6, Civil Engineering Departament, University of Texas, 1986, pp. 1-292.

[12] M. Jamiolkowski, R Lancellotta, and D. Lo Presti, “Remarks on the Stiffnes at Small Strain of six Italian Clays”, in International Symposium on Pre-failure Deformation Characterictics of Geomaterials, Hokkaido’94, Shibuya, Mitachi&Miura, Eds. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1995, pp. 817-836.

[13] B.O. Hardin, “The Nature of Stress-strain behaviour for Soils”, in Proc. ASCE Geotechnical Div. Specialty Conf. On Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Pasadena, 1978, pp. 3-90.

[14] P. Lumb, “Applications of Statistics in Soil Mechanics”, in Soil Mechanics-New Horizons, J. K. Lee, Ed. Newness-Batterworth,1974, pp. 44-111.

[15] Z. Młynarek, J. Wierzbicki, K. Stefaniak, “Deformation characteristics of overconsolidated subsoil from CPTU and SDMT tests”, in Proc. Geotechnical and Geophisical Site Characterisation Conference on Site Characterization ISC-4, vol. 1. London: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd., 2013, pp. 1189-1193.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Młynarek, Zbigniew, et al. “Use of DMT and CPTU Tests in the Evaluation of Shear Modulus G0 for Soils of Different Origin”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 1, Mar. 2023, pp. 539-52, doi:10.24425/ace.2023.144187.

Issue

Section

Articles