English
Język Polski
Modern management methods in the implementation of construction projects on the example of contingency plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.145256Abstract
The implementation of processes comprising the overall project management consists in the use of various tools, methods and techniques depending on the type of the project. The knowledge of the industry and the characteristics of construction projects make it possible to select those which, on the one hand, will not cause difficulties for the contractors and on the other, will, in fact, constitute a necessary complement to the technical skills of the project manager. Construction companies face situations that have a profound impact on the failure of projects. Such occurrences include a large number of simultaneously implemented projects, the appointment of a person who knows the project mainly from the implementation side as the project manager, a failure to perform risk analysis and procedures that become irrelevant when deadlines are approaching. After reviewing the available construction projects, analysing the literature, consulting experts and making observations, the authors determined that the majority of difficulties and failures result from omissions or errors that take place during the project planning and implementation stages. The following paper outlines the selected elements of project management, whose application in construction projects may significantly affect their final success and the results obtained. It also includes an example of the use of modern management methods, which certainly include risk management methods. A utilitarian tool addressing the effects of risk analysis is a contingency plan. Contingency may be translated as eventuality, possibility and sometimes also as coincidence.References
[1] D. Jandacka, M. Decky, K. Hodasova, P. Pisca, and D. Briliak, “Influence of the urban intersection reconstruction on the reduction of road traffic noise pollution”, Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 17, art. no. 8878, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12178878.
[2] E. Remišová, M. Decký, M. Mikolaš, M. Hájek, L. Kovalčík, and M. Mečár, “Design of road pavement using recycled aggregate”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 44, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/44/2/022016.
[3] J. Rzempała, D. Borkowski, and A.P. Rzempała, “Risk identification in cogeneration (combined heat and power) projects: a Polish case study”, Energies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15010042.
[4] E. Kulińska, Aksjologiczny wymiar zarządzania ryzykiem procesów logistycznych: modele i eksperymenty ekonomiczne. Opole: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Opolskiej, 2011, pp. 42-43.
[5] A. Siewiera, “Analiza ryzyka w procesie zarządzania projektem budowlanym”, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, no. 2, pp. 175-184, 2018, doi: 10.18276/frfu.2018.92-15.
[6] M. Górski, A. Dziadosz, and D. Skorupka, “Zarządzanie ryzykiem według metodyki PRINCE2 w przedsięwzięciach budowlanych”, Zeszyty Naukowe/Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki, no. 3, pp. 41-53, 2010.
[7] I. Łapuńka and D. Biniasz, “Badanie kompetencji menedżerów projektów w przedsiębiorstwach budowlanych”, Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 101-111, 2013.
[8] A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, PMBOK Guide, 3rd ed. Project Management Inst., 2004.
[9] O. Kapliński, A. Dziadosz, and J.L. Zioberski, “Próba standaryzacji procesu zarządzania na etapie planowania i realizacji przedsięwzieć budowlanych”, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, Budownictwo i Inżynieria Środowiska, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1-11, 2011.
[10] W. Czaczkowski, “Zastosowanie metodyki PRINCE2 do skutecznego zarządzania przedsięwzięciem budowlanym”, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Architectura, vol. 12, no. 3, 2013, pp. 149-160.
[11] J.R. Turney, A. Ledwith, and J. Kelly, “Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises. A comparison between firms by size and industry”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 2, no. 2, 2009, doi: 10.1108/17538370910949301.
[12] E. Głodziński, “Wspomaganie controllingu przedsięwzięć budowlanych systemami informatycznymi: wymagania, stan obecny i perspektywy”, Zeszyty Naukowe. Studia Informatica/Uniwersytet Szczecinski, vol. 38, pp. 21-36, 2015.
[13] D. Skorupka, “Metoda oceny ryzyka realizacji przedsięwzięć inżynieryjno-budowlanych”, Zeszyty Naukowe WSOWL, no. 3, pp. 79-88, 2007.
[14] D. Skorupka, Metoda identyfikacji i oceny ryzyka realizacji przedsięwzięć budowlanych. Warszawa: Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, 2007.
[15] D. Skorupka, Innovations in construction projects. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2019.
[16] A. Dziadosz and A. Kończak, “Review of selected methods of supporting decision-making process in the construction industry”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 111-126, 2016, doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0055.
[17] A. Sobotka and A. Radziejowska, “Risk analysis in the realization of buildings in revitalized areas”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 113-126, 2019, doi: 10.2478/ace-2019-0038.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
