Laboratory testing of selected prototype under sleeper pads (USPs) - pull-off strength determined after the weather resistance test

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.145280

Abstract

Under sleeper pads (USPs) are resilient elements used in the ballasted track structures to improve dynamic behaviour of the track, reduce vibration and protect the ballast against fast degradation. As the elements permanently connected to the sleepers or turnout bearers, the pads must have an appropriate level of pull-off strength, so that they do not separate from the rail support (here: sleeper) during their transportation to the construction site or during many years of operation. In this paper, results of pull-off tests performed on four selected USP samples are presented: three samples made of SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber) granulate and one made of polyurethane. Moreover, details of the pad’s attachment to the rail support are discussed, and the requirements for the USP properties are specified, focusing on the pull-off strength determined after the weather resistance test. It is shown that only two out of four considered USP samples fulfilled the requirements specified by the authors.

References

[1] R. Schilder, “USP (Under Sleeper Pads): a contribution to save money in track maintenance”, presented at AusRAIL PLUS 2013, 26-28 November 2013, Sydney, Australia, 2013.

[2] M. Sol-Sánchez, F. Moreno-Navarro, and M.C. Rubio-Gámez, “The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: a state of the art review”, Construction and Building Materials, 75, pp. 293-305, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.027.

[3] D.L. Iliev, “Die horizontale Gleislagestabilität des Schotteroberbaus mit konventionellen und elastisch besohlten Schwellen”, Technische Universität München, 2012.

[4] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, W. Oleksiewicz, and W. Karwowski, “Static and dynamic parameters of railway tracks retrofitted with under sleeper pads”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 187-201, 2018, doi: 10.2478/ace-2018-0070.

[5] C. Jayasuriya, B. Indraratna, and T. Ngoc Ngo, “Experimental study to examine the role of under sleeper pads for improved performance of ballast under cyclic loading”, Transportation Geotechnics, vol. 19, pp. 61-73, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.01.005.

[6] J. Neuhold and M. Landgraf, “Effects of under sleeper pads on long-termtrack quality behaviour”, presented at the 5th International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure, 17-19 May 2018, Zadar, Croatia, 2018, doi: 10.5592/CO/CETRA.2018.885.

[7] Y. Guo, J. Wang, and V. Markine, “Ballast mechanical performance with and without under sleeper pads”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 3202-3217, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12205-020-2043-5.

[8] A. Johansson, J.C.O. Nielsen, R. Bolmsvik, A. Karlström, and R. Lundén, “Under sleeper pads - Influence on dynamic train-track interaction”,Wear, vol. 265, pp. 1479-1487, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.032.

[9] A. Omodaka, T. Kumakura, and T. Konishi, “Maintenance reduction by the development of resilient sleepers for ballasted track with optimal under-sleeper pads”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 59, pp. 53-56, 2017, doi: 10.1016/ j.procir.2016.09.039.

[10] T. Abadi, L. Le Pen, A. Zervos, and W. Powrie, “Effect of sleeper interventions on railway track performance”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 145, no. 4, art. no. 04019009, 2019, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002022.

[11] A. Paixão, J.N. Varandas, E. Fortunato, and R. Calçada, “Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges”, Engineering Structures, vol. 164, pp. 169-182, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.005.

[12] J. Mottahed, J.A. Zakeri, and S. Mohammadzadeh, “Field investigation on the effects of using USPs in transition zone from ballasted track to bridges”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1421-1431, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40999-019-00440-3.

[13] M. Krużyński, E. Kwiatkowska, and J. Zwolski, “Badania dynamiczne toru kolejowego”, Przegląd komunikacyjny, no. 11, pp. 23-28, 2012.

[14] M. Sol-Sánchez, F. Moreno-Navarro, and M.C. Rubio-Gámez, “Viability of using end-of-life tire pads as under sleeper pads in railway”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 64, pp. 150-156, 2014, doi: 10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2014.04.013.

[15] M. Esmaeili, A. Shamohammadi, and S. Farsi, “Effect of deconstructed tire under sleeper pad on railway ballast degradation under cyclic loading”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 136, art. no. 106265, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106265.

[16] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, and A. Piotrowski, “Experimental research on fatigue strength of prototype under sleeper pads used in the ballasted rail track systems”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 241-255, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ace.2020.131786.

[17] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, and A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, “Laboratory tests of resistance to severe environmental conditions of prototypical under sleeper pads applied in the ballasted track structures”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 319-331, doi: 10.24425/ace.2021.138058.

[18] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, and A. Piotrowski, “Resistance to severe environmental conditions of prototypical recycling-based under ballast mats (UBMs) used as vibration isolators in the ballasted track systems”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 319, no. 9, art. no. 126075, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126075.

[19] EN 1542:2000 Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures. Test methods. Measurement of bond strength by pull-off.

[20] Fimor. [Online]. Available: https://www.fimor-polyurethane.com/en/. [Accessed: 22.06.2019].

[21] Getzner. [Online]. Available: https://www.getzner.com/pl. [Accessed: 28.11.2022].

[22] L. Kazniczy, “Egy “Frankó” Aljapapucs”, presented at XX. Nemzetkozi Epitestudomanyi Konferencia EPKO 2016, 1-5 June 2016, Csíksomlyó, Jakab Antal Ház, Romania, 2016.

[23] S.G. Yun, S. Yang, J.H. Eum, and S.Y. Chang, Patent KR100699548B1. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/KR100699548B1/ko. [Accessed: 03.07.2019].

[24] Sateba. [Online]. Available: https://sateba.com/. [Accessed: 28.11.2022].

[25] VF Systems. [Online]. Available: https://www.vf-systems-railways.com/v-fit-usp-under-sleeper-pads/. [Accessed: 05.07.2019].

[26] Edilon Sedra. [Online]. Available: https://www.edilonsedra.com/. [Accessed: 28.11.2022].

[27] IRS 70713-1 Railway Application - Track & Structure “Under Sleeper Pads (USP) - Recommendations for Use”, 1st edition, 01.04.2018.

[28] RFI TCAR SF AR 03 007 C, Specifica tecnica di fornitura: Tappetini sotto traversa (USP), 2017.

[29] SNCF IG04013 Traverses et supports béton pour pose ballastée équipées de semelles résilientes en sous faces (ex CT IGEV 016), 14.08.2018.

[30] EN 16730:2016 Railway applications - track - concrete sleepers and bearers with under sleeper pads.

[31] DB Netz AG, DBS 918 145-01 Technische Lieferbedingungen, Spannbetonschwellen mit elastischer Sohle - Elastische Schwellensohlen, 2016.

[32] H. Loy, M. Biskup, and E. Kwiatkowska, “Measuring the vibration-isolating effect of an elastic superstructure in Poland”, Global Railway Review, vol. 24, no. 1, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Kraśkiewicz, Cezary, et al. “Laboratory Testing of Selected Prototype under Sleeper Pads (USPs) - Pull-off Strength Determined After the Weather Resistance Test”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 2, June 2023, pp. 483-01, doi:10.24425/ace.2023.145280.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.