Laboratory tests of pull-off strength of chosen USPs attached to concrete sleepers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.147658

Abstract

Resilient under sleeper pads (USPs) are vibration isolators used in the ballasted track structure to improve the dynamic performance of the track, reduce vibrations and protect the ballast layer. Being permanently connected with the rail supports (sleepers or turnout bearers), the pads must exhibit a proper value of the pull-off strength, which ensures that they do not separate from the supports while being transported to the construction site or during many years of exploitation. This study focuses on the experimental determination of the pull-off strength of USPs attached to full scale prestressed concrete sleepers. Three variants are tested: two pads equipped with different anchor layers attached to the sleepers in the production plant and one pad glued to the sleeper in the laboratory. Some of the tested USPs are made of recycled styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR). An important part of the work is specification of the requirements for the pull-off strength of USPs, as well as the requirements for sleepers and turnout bearers equipped with resilient pads.

References

[1] R. Schilder, “USP (Under Sleeper Pads): a contribution to save money in track maintenance”, presented at AusRAIL PLUS 2013, 26-28 November 2013, Sydney, Australia, 2013.

[2] M. Sol-Sánchez, F. Moreno-Navarro, and M.C. Rubio-Gámez, “The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: A state of the art review”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 75, pp. 293-305, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.027.

[3] D.L. Iliev, “Die horizontale Gleislagestabilität des Schotteroberbaus mit konventionellen und elastisch besohlten Schwellen”, Technische Universität München, 2012.

[4] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, W. Oleksiewicz, and W. Karwowski, “Static and dynamic parameters of railway tracks retrofitted with under sleeper pads”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 187-201, 2018, doi: 10.2478/ace-2018-0070.

[5] A. Paixão, J.N. Varandas, E. Fortunato, and R. Calçada, “Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges”, Engineering Structures, vol. 164, pp. 169-182, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.005.

[6] J. Mottahed, J. A. Zakeri, and S. Mohammadzadeh, “Field investigation on the effects of using USPs in transition zone from ballasted track to bridges”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1421-1431, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40999-019-00440-3.

[7] L. Le Pen, G. Watson, A. Hudson, and W. Powrie, “The behaviour of under-sleeper pads at switches and crossings (S&C) – field measurements”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 232, no. 4, pp. 1049-1063, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0954409717707400.

[8] S. Kaewunruen, A. Aikawa, and A. Remennikov, “Vibration attenuation at rail joints through under sleeper pads”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 189, pp. 193-198, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.031.

[9] J. Zakeri, M. Esmaeili, and H. Heydari, “A field investigation into the effect of under sleeper pads on the reduction of railway-induced ground-borne vibrations”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 230, no. 3, pp. 999-1005, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0954409714565499.

[10] A. Omodaka, T. Kumakura, and T. Konishi, “Maintenance reduction by the development of resilient sleepers for ballasted track with optimal under-sleeper pads”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 59, pp. 53-56, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.039.

[11] H. Gräbe, B. Mtshotana, M. Sebati, and E. Thünemann, “The effects of under-sleeper pads on sleeper-ballast interaction”, Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 2016, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 35-41, 2016, doi: 10.17159/2309-8775/2016/v58n2a4.

[12] X. Qu, M. Ma, L. Minghang, Y. Cao, and W. Liu, “Analysis of the vibration mitigation characteristics of the ballasted ladder track with elastic elements”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 23, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11236780.

[13] T. Abadi, L. Le Pen, A. Zervos, and W. Powrie, “Effect of sleeper interventions on railway track performance”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 145, no. 4, art. no. 04019009, 2019, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002022.

[14] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, and A. Piotrowski, “Experimental research on fatigue strength of prototype under sleeper pads used in the ballasted rail track systems”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 241-255, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ace.2020.131786.

[15] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, and A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, “Laboratory tests of resistance to severe environmental conditions of prototypical under sleeper pads applied in the ballasted track structures”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 319-331, 2021, doi: 10.24425/ace.2021.138058.

[16] C. Kraśkiewicz, A. Zbiciak, J. Medyński, and A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, “Laboratory testing of selected prototype under sleeper pads (USPs) – pull-off strength determined after the weather resistance test”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 483-501, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ace.2023.145280.

[17] EN 1542:2000 Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures. Test methods. Measurement of bond strength by pull-off.

[18] EN 16730:2016 Railway applications – track – concrete sleepers and bearers with under sleeper pads.

[19] IRS 70713-1 Railway Application – Track & Structure “Under Sleeper Pads (USP) – Recommendations for Use”, 1st edition 01.04.2018.

[20] DB Netz AG, DBS 918 145-01 Technische Lieferbedingungen, Spannbetonschwellen mit elastischer Sohle – Elastische Schwellensohlen, 2016.

[21] RFI TCAR SF AR 03 007 C, Specifica tecnica di fornitura: Tappetini sotto traversa (USP), 2017.

[22] Infrabel, Technische bepaling L-23: Fabricatie en levering van betonnen monoblok dwarsliggers, uitgave: 2009.

[23] SNCF IG04013 Traverses et supports béton pour pose ballastée équipées de semelles résilientes en sous faces (ex CT IGEV 016) 14.08.2018.

[24] Warunki techniczne wykonania i odbioru podkładów i podrozjazdnic strunobetonowych Id-101. Załacznik do uchwały Nr 106/2020 Zarządu PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. z dnia 11 lutego 2020 r.

[25] C. Kraśkiewicz, H. Anysz, M. Płudowska-Zagrajek, and A. Al Sabouni-Zawadzka, “Artificial neural networks as a tool for selecting the parameters of prototypical under sleeper pads produced from recycled rubber granulate”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 405, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136975.

[26] B. Indraratna, Y. Qi, T.N. Ngo, C. Rujikiatkamjorn, T. Neville, F.B. Ferreira, and A. Shahkolahi, “Use of geogrids and recycled rubber in railroad infrastructure for enhanced performance”, Geosciences, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.3390/geosciences9010030.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Kraśkiewicz, Cezary, et al. “Laboratory Tests of Pull-off Strength of Chosen USPs Attached to Concrete Sleepers”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 4, Dec. 2023, pp. 247-62, doi:10.24425/ace.2023.147658.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.