The durability of inverted roof insulation kits

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2024.148910

Abstract

The paper analyses the loss mechanism of roof insulation kits’ performance due to dampness increase in the insulation layers. The analyzed structures were used in standard conditions for ten years and had thermal insulation made of expanded polystyrene with a hydrophobized surface. The dampness of the thermal insulation materials was determined after the referenced period for their future fitness as roof insulation, based on laboratory tests of material samples collected from the structures. They were completed with a computer simulation of heat transfer and dampness in the partition for working conditions specified for ten years, assuming the thermal conductivity was determined for the materials collected from the analyzed roofs. It was discovered that simulation-based calculation dampness values are much lower than those observed after ten years of roof utilization. Additionally, the authors attempted to determine the correlations between the period of thermal insulation materials used in real conditions and the selected properties of the products determined in laboratory tests. To that end, the collected material was dried to constant weight and then subjected to accelerated aging through total immersion in water at room temperature, for twenty-eight days, followed by 300 freeze-thaw cycles at –20°C and +20°C. The results helped conclude that the abovementioned laboratory testing cycle does not allow for assessing the fitness for the use of the referenced products for ten years. The directions of future laboratory tests were set, suggesting extending the testing cycle at least twice.

References

[1] D. Kalibatas and V. Kovaitis, “Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 650–660, 2017, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808.

[2] Z. Petrakova and M. Grznar, “Methods of multi-criteria decision making in the choice of an alternative solution in the reconstruction process of a flat roof”, Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 1–11, 2004.

[3] K. Firkowicz-Pogorzelska and B. Francke, Design and construction of inverted roofs. Guide.Warsaw: ITB, 2012.

[4] Etag 031- Guideline for European Technical Approval of Inverted Roof Insulation Kits. Part 1: General. European Organisation for Technical Approvals, 2010.

[5] Z. Kutnar, “Development of flat roof assemblies – interaction defects and failures”, in Ploché strechy. Praha, 2005, pp. 284–305.

[6] A. Espinosa-Fernández, V. Echarri-Iribarren, and C. A. Sáez, “Water-Covered Roof Versus Inverted Flat Roof on the Mediterranean Coast: A Comparative Study of Thermal and Energy Behavior”, Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 7, art. no. 2288, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10072288.

[7] E. Oberndorfer, J. Lundholm, B. Bass, R.R. Coffman, H. Doshi, N. Dunnett, S. Gaffin, M. Kohler, K.K.Y. Liu, and B. Rowe, “Green Roofs as Urban Ecosystems: Ecological Structures, Functions, and Services”, BioScience, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 823–833, 2007, doi: 10.1641/B571005.

[8] K.L. Gettera, D.B. Rowea, J.A. Andresenb, and I.S. Wichmanc, “Seasonal heat flux properties of an extensive green roof in a Midwestern U.S. climate”, Energy and Buildings, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 3548–3557, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.018.

[9] A. Baryła, T. Gnatowski, A. Karczmarczyk, and J. Szatyłowicz, “Changes in temperature and moisture content of an extensive – type green roof”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 9, art. no. 2498, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11092498.

[10] J.A. Pogorzelski, K. Firkowicz-Pogorzelska, and A. Bobociński, Prace Instytutu Techniki Budowlanej – Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 57–69, 2006.

[11] EAD 040650-00-1201 Extruded polystyrene foam boards as load bearing layer and/or thermal insulation outside the waterproofings. European Organisation for Technical Approvals, 2017.

[12] EAD 040773-00-1201 Expanded polystyrene foam boards as load bearing layer and thermal insulation outside the waterproofings. European Organisation for Technical Approvals, 2018.

[13] P. Nowak and M. Skłodkowski, “Muliticriteria analysis of selected thermal insulation solutions”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 137–148, 2016, doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0088.

[14] A. Żaczyńska and T. Cholewa, “The profitability analysis of enhancement of parameters of the thermal insulation of building partions”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 335–347, 2014, doi: 10.2478/ace-2014-0023.

[15] M.Z.T. Anuar, N.N. Sarbini, I.S. Ibrahim, S.H. Othman, and M.N. Reba, “Building condition ratings using infrared thermography: a preliminary study”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ace.2022.143046.

[16] B. Francke, “Selected operational problems of inverted flat roofs layers”, Builder, vol. 2, pp. 14–17, 2020.

[17] J. Potter and H. Evans, “A review of recent guidance on inverted roof construction”, Technical Paper, vol. 11, no. 1, 2001.

[18] I. Misar and M. Novotný, “Defects and behaviour of inverted flat roof from the point of building physics”, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 93, art. no. 02002, pp. 1–7, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20179302002.

[19] D. Zirkelbach, B. Schafaczek, and H. Künzel, “Thermal Performance Degradation of Foam Insulation in Inverted Roofs Due to Moisture Accumulation”, presented at XII DBMC International Conference on Durability of building Materials and Components, Porto, Portugal, 2011.

[20] H. Künzel and K. Kiebl, “Moisture Behaviour of Protected Membrane Roofs with Greenery”, CIB W40 Proceedings Kyoto, vol. 1, 1997.

[21] H. Künzel, “Bieten begrunte Umkehrdacher einen dauerhaften Warmeschutz”, IBP-Mitteilung, no. 271, 1995.

[22] H. Künzel, “Feuchteverhalten von Umkehrdachern mit massiven Deckschichten”, IBP-Mitteilung, no. 295, 1996.

[23] B. Francke, “Testing and assessment of the serviceability and durability of roof coverings”, in Diagnostics of Building Objects. Testing and Assessment of Building Elements and Objects, 1st ed. Warsaw: PWN Publishing House, 2021, pp. 277-307.

[24] B. Francke and R. Geryło, “Inverted roof insulation kits and their durability”, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 163, art. no. 08005, pp. 1-8, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201816308005.

[25] PN-EN 13163+A2:2016-12 Wyroby do izolacji cieplnej w budownictwie – Wyroby ze styropianu (EPS) produkowane fabrycznie – Specyfikacja. PKN, 2016.

[26] PN-EN 12667:2002 Właściwości cieplne materiałów i wyrobów budowlanych – Określanie oporu cieplnego metodami osłoniętej płyty grzejnej i czujnika strumienia cieplnego –Wyroby o dużym i średnim oporze cieplnym. PKN, 2002.

[27] PN-EN ISO 16535:2019-08 Wyroby do izolacji cieplnej w budownictwie – Określanie nasiąkliwości wodą przy długotrwałym zanurzeniu. PKN, 2019.

[28] PN-EN 12091:2013-07 Wyroby do izolacji cieplnej w budownictwie – Określanie odporności na zamrażanie-odmrażanie. PKN, 2013.

[29] “Software Fraunhofer IBP WUFI Home Page”, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://wufi.de/en/.

[30] “Charakterystyka wybranych elementów klimatu w Polsce w styczniu 2022 roku”, IMGW-PIB. [Online]. Available: https://imgw.pl/wydarzenia/imgw-pib-charakterystyka-wybranych-elementow-klimatu-w-polsce-wstyczniu-2022-roku. [Accessed 02.03.2023].

[31] “Charakterystyka wybranych elementów klimatu w Polsce w sierpniu 2022 roku. Podsumowanie sezonu letniego”, IMGW-PIB. [Online]. Available: https://imgw.pl/wydarzenia/charakterystyka-wybranych-elementowklimatu-w-polsce-w-sierpniu-2022-roku-podsumowanie. [Accessed 02.03.2023].

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Francke, Barbara, et al. “The Durability of Inverted Roof Insulation Kits”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 70, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 261-75, doi:10.24425/ace.2024.148910.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.