English
Język Polski
Method for choice of industrial hall walls variants optimization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2025.153350Abstract
The current trends in the construction market require developing and completing building projects with balanced costs and the shortest execution time, while maintaining a high quality of works and properties of completed objects. Achieving this goal is difficult, however with the development of new technologies and management techniques, a sustainable project is possible to achieve. The authors’ goal was to find a technological solution which would efficiently meet the imposed requirements for optimizing the technology and organization project of the hall. Three technologies were analysed using the multi – criteria analysis based on the 6 aspects – all important from the sustainability point view. Choice and proper check of the criteria for sustainable decision making is crucial, as criteria are usually described by experts in not fully objective and mathematical way. Chosen elements of the Value Engineering (VE) practices were discussed and used. In order to evaluate each construction variant the weight of every criteria was determined using the Simos method and the variants’ data was normalized. The practicality of every construction variant as a sustainable solution was established through two evaluation methods – the entropy and the ideal point method. The results of this research prove that project managers can successfully achieve sustainable projects through the described optimization process. Similarly, this type of analysis can also be beneficial in other fields, such as mechanical engineering, finance, transportation, agriculture etc.References
[1] J. Sobieraj, “Management of Housing Investment Projects”, Krakow Małopolskie Studies, no. 20, pp. 171-199, 2015.
[2] P. Nowak and D. Krawczyk, “Optimierung der Revitalisier ungskosten von Bestandsobjekten”, Bauingenieur – Germany, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 28-32, 2020.
[3] J. Rosłon, M.V. Książek-Nowak, P. Nowak and J. Zawistowski, “Cash-Flow Schedules Optimization within Life Cycle Costing (LCC)”, MDPI Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 1-15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12198201.
[4] J. Rosłon, M.V. Książek-Nowak and P. Nowak, “Schedules Optimization with the Use of Value Engineering and NPV Maximization”, MDPI Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1-21, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12187454.
[5] D. Walasek, Value Engineering Analysis for Chosen Variants of Construction. Warsaw University of Technology, 2012.
[6] K. Jaworski, Methodology of site management organisation. Warsaw: Scientific Publisher PWN, 2009.
[7] P. Nowak, M.V. Książek, M. Draps and J. Zawistowski, “Decision Making with Use of Building Information Modeling”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 153, pp. 519-526, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.177.
[8] P. Nowak and J. Rosłon, Eds., Optimization of construction processes. POLCEN, Erasmus+ project result, Warsaw, 2017.
[9] J. Zieliński, Intelligent Systems in Management. Theory and practice. Warsaw: Scientific Publisher PWN, 2000.
[10] M. Mielcarz, Technology and Organisation of steel and reinforced concrete hall construction at 34 Marywilska street in Warsaw. Warsaw University of Technology, Civil Engineering Faculty, 2019.
[11] K. Tauszyński, General Construction. Warsaw: Publisher WSiP, 1975.
[12] “Walls and cladding of steel halls”, Steel Construction JANO sp. z o.o. [Online]. Available: https://jano.com.pl/oferta/sciany-i-obudowa-hal-stalowych. [Accessed: 28.09.2020].
[13] “Exterior wall systems in halls – a comparison”, MCM Project. [Online]. [Accessed: 27.10.2020].
[14] “Wall – cassettes”. [Online]. [Accessed 17.12.2020].
[15] M. Krzemiński, Methods of Decision Making. Project NERW PW. Science – Education – Development – Co-operation. Warsaw University of Technology, 2019.
[16] D. Metelski, P. Nowak and J. Sobieraj, “PMBoK vs. PRINCE2 in the context of Polish construction projects: Structural Equation Modelling approach”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 551-579, 2021, doi: 10.24425/ace.2021.137185.
[17] N. Ibadov and J. Rosłon, “Technology selection for construction project, with the use of fuzzy preference relation”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 105-118, 2015, doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0028.
[18] K. Rudnik and A. Deptuła, “Estimating the importance of risk assessment criteria for innovative projects with the use of Shannon entropy”, Studies and Works The Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management of the University of Szczecin, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 127-140, 2018, doi: 10.18276/sip.2018.52/2-09.
[19] B. Sroka, J. Rosłon, M. Podolski, W. Bożejko, A. Burduk, and M. Wodecki, "Profit optimization for multimode repetitive construction project with cash flows using metaheuristics”, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 1-17, 2021, do:10.1007/s43452-021-00218-2.
[20] J. Kulejewski, N. Ibadov, J. Rosłon, and J. Zawistowski, “Cash Flow Optimization for Renewable Energy Construction Projects with a New Approach to Critical Chain Scheduling”, Energies, vol. 14, no. 18, art. no. 5795, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14185795.
[21] J. Rosłon, M. Książek-Nowak, P. Nowak, and J. Zawistowski, "Cash-Flow Schedules Optimization within Life Cycle Costing (LCC)”, MDPI Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, art. no. 8201, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12198201.
[22] J. Rosłon and J. Kulejewski, "A hybrid approach for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem in construction”, Open Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7-13, 2019, doi: 10.1515/eng-2019-0006.
[23] H. Lalghorbani and A. Jahan, “Selection of a Wheat Harvester according to Qualitative and quantitative Criteria”, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. art. no. 1313, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031313.
[24] J. Kelly, S. Male, and D. Graham, Value Management of Construction Projects. Blackwell Science, 2004, doi: 10.1002/9781119007258.
[25] M. Thomas, Managing Building Pathology and Maintenance. Construction Managers’ Library. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza PW, 2013.
[26] J. Fernandes, S. Mathijs, and D. Stroobants, Sustainability in Construction – the Evolution and Return to the Past. Construction Managers’ Library. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza PW
[27] S. Akram, et al., Value Management in Construction. Construction Managers’ Library. Warszaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza PW, 2013.
[28] T. Kuhlmanand and J. Farrington, “What is Sustainability?”, Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 3436-3448, 2010, doi: 10.3390/su2113436.
[29] M.A. Rosen and H.A. Kishawy, “Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs”, Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 154-174, 2012, doi: 10.3390/su4020154.
[30] A. Kaliszuk-Wietecka, Budownictwo zrównoważone. Warsaw: Publisher PWN, 2017.
[31] P. Nowak and M. Skłodkowski, “Multicriteria Analysis of Selected Building Thermal Insulation Solutions”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 137-148, 2016.
[32] Pruszyński. [Online]. Available: pruszynski.com.pl. [Accessed: 06.02.2022].
[33] Izolacje. [Online]. Available: izolacje.com.pl/. [Accessed: 06.02.2022].
[34] A. Meisert and F. Böttcher, “Towards a Discourse-Based Understanding of Sustainability Education and Decision Making”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 21, art. no. 5902, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11215902.
[35] M. Anholcer, Badania operacyjne. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, 2009.
[36] L. Reszka, “The applicability of the simos’ method to determination of weights in optimal multicriteria decision making in logistics”, Transport Economics and Logistics, vol. 66, pp. 81-88, 2017, doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.5599.
[37] E.K. Zavadskas and J. Antucheviciene, “Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building’s regeneration alternatives”, Building and Environment, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 436-451, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001.
[38] L. Diaz-Balteiro, J. González-Pachón, and C. Romero, “Measuring Systems Sustainability with Multi-Criteria Methods: A Critical Review”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 258, no. 2, pp. 607-616, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075.
[39] Z. Li, Y. Xue, D. Qiu, et al., “AHP-Ideal Point Model for Large Underground Petroleum Storage Site Selection: An Engineering Application”, MDPI Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 12, art. no. 2343, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9122343.
[40] L. Ding, Z. Shao, H. Zhang, C. Xu, and D. Wu, “A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method”, MDPI Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 8, art. no. 746, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8080746.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
