Experimental investigation of point-fixed laminated glass with enhanced post-breakage capacity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2025.155110

Abstract

For many years, the transparency of glass has been a major feature that has excited architects to search for new applications for this material in architecture. Laminated glass is commonly used for structural elements. This requires a durable bond between at least two glass layers and an interlayer. When the glass is fractured, the interlayer holds the glass fragments together. Introducing reinforcement into the cross-section of glass laminates is a way to improve the load-bearing capacity in the post-failure phase. This paper summarises the main results of the research project "Innovative solutions for point-fixed laminated glass with increased load-bearing capacity" funded by the National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) under the LIDER XI Programme. The article presents the results of destructive tests on laminated glass panes in three load configurations: in-plane, perpendicular to the plane, and combined loading. An important aspect of the work is the testing of full-scale elements. The results of the research can be applied directly to the safety analysis of glass structures, making them significant in terms of failure prevention.

References

[1] M. Patterson, Structural glass facades and enclosures. New York: Wiley, 2011.

[2] X. Centelles, J.R. Castro, and L.F. Cabeza, “Experimental results of mechanical, adhesive, and laminated connections for laminated glass elements – a review”, Engineering Structures, vol. 180, pp. 192-204, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.029.

[3] A. Malewski, M. Kozłowski, W. Sumelka, and M. Połedniok, “Large scale architectural glass slumping process-challenges and limitations”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 485-505, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ace.2020.135233.

[4] M. Martín, X. Centelles, A. Solé, et al., “Polymeric interlayer materials for laminated glass: A review”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 230, art. no. 116897, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116897.

[5] A. Vedrtnam and S.J. Pawar, “Laminated Plate Theories and fracture of laminated glass plate – a review”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 186, pp. 316-330, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.020.

[6] L. Grębowski and A.Wróbel, “Architectural and Urban Planning Solutions for the protection of heritage buildings in the context of terrorist attacks: Following the example of Passive Protection Systems”, Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12070988.

[7] R. Royer-Carfagni and M. Silvestri, “Fail-safe point fixing of structural glass. new advances”, Engineering Structures, vol. 31, no. 8, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.050.

[8] I. Stelzer and M. Singh Rooprai, “Post Breakage Strength Testing for Overhead Laminated Glass”, presented at Challenging Glass 5 – Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, 16-17 June 2016, Ghent University, Belgium, 2016, doi: 10.7480/cgc.5.2265.

[9] V. Quaglini, S. Cattaneo, and L. Biolzi, “Numerical assessment of laminated cantilevered glass plates with point fixing”, Glass Structures & Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 187-204, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40940-020-00119-5.

[10] C. Zhao, J. Yang, X. Wang, and I. Azim, “Experimental investigation into the post-breakage performance of pre-cracked laminated glass plates”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 224, pp. 996-1006, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.286.

[11] L. Biolzi, S.S. Cattaneo, and M. Simoncelli, “Post-failure behavior of 2-ply laminated glass plates with different interlayers”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 268, art. no. 108496, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108496.

[12] F. Bos, C. Louter, and F. Veer, “Structural Glass Beams with Embedded Glass Fibre Reinforcement”, presented at Challenging Glass 2 – Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, 20-21 May 2010, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2010.

[13] C. Bedon and C. Louter, “Structural glass beams with embedded GFRP, CFRP or steel reinforcement rods: Comparative experimental, analytical and numerical investigations”, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 227-241, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.008.

[14] M. Achintha and T. Zirbo, “Developments in GFRP Reinforced Bolted Joints in Glass”, presented at Challenging Glass 6 – Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, 17-18 May 2018, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2018.

[15] M. Achintha and T. Zirbo, “GFRP reinforced high performance glass-bolted joints: Concept and experimental characterization”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 274, art. no. 122058, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122058.

[16] M. Achintha and B. Balan, “Mechanical prestressing of annealed glass beams using pretensioned GFRP: Characterisation and potentiality”, Structures, vol. 20, pp. 11-19, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.017.

[17] M. Kozłowski, D. Wasik, and K. Zemła, “Monotonic and Creep Studies on the Pull-through Resistance of Laminated Glass with Locally Embedded Steel Mesh”, Materials, vol. 15, no. 20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ma15207083.

[18] M. Kozłowski, D. Wasik, and K. Zemła, “Increased post-breakage strength of point-fixed laminated glass with locally embedded woven steel mesh”, presented at 4th International Conference on Materials Design and Applications, 7-8 July 2022, University of Porto, Portugal, 2022.

[19] M. Kozłowski and D. Wasik, “Post-failure load-bearing capacity of point-fixed laminated glass with locally embedded steel mesh”, presented at 31st International Conference on Structural Failures, 20-24 May 2024, Międzyzdroje, Poland, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Kozłowski, Marcin, and Dominik Wasik. “Experimental Investigation of Point-Fixed Laminated Glass With Enhanced Post-Breakage Capacity”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 71, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 447-58, doi:10.24425/ace.2025.155110.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.