English
Język Polski
Damage characteristics analysis of self-anchored suspension bridge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2025.156170Abstract
Based on a self-anchored suspension bridge with a long span and complex structure, this paper makes a detailed analysis of its stress characteristics before damage and damage characteristics after damage through finite element analysis and bridge load test. Aiming at the main vulnerable components of the main girder, a variety of identification methods based on the existing dynamic damage identification methods are selected for comparative analysis of damage identification, and finally an effective method suitable for bridge girder damage monitoring is determined according to the identification effect of each method. Different damages of main girder, bridge tower and suspender are simulated respectively, and then the static and dynamic damage characteristics of the structure under the same conditions before and after the damage are analyzed with the results of nondestructive analysis of the bridge as reference. The results show that the internal force and deformation caused by the same static and dynamic load and the inherent dynamic characteristics of the structure will change correspondingly when different damages occur to the structure, but the change is small for the moderate damage of 20%. After the suspenders fail completely, the deformation and internal force of the bridge will increase greatly, and the cable force of the adjacent suspenders will increase by 50%.References
[1] L. Jianhui, L. Aiqun, and Q.F. Maria, “Sensitivity and reliability analysis of a self-anchored suspension bridge”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 703-711, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000424.
[2] W. Zhiyong, G. Guohe, et al., “Investigation on cracking performance of UHPC overlaid concrete deck at hogging moment zone of steel-concrete composite girders”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 445-457, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ace.2023.147669.
[3] X. Fuyou, Z. Mingjie, W. Lei, and Z. Zhe, “Self-anchored suspension bridges in China”, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000304.
[4] L. Yan, Z. Chengxin, L. Jun, et al., “Flexural performances of steel-concrete composite section of self-anchored suspension bridge: Experimental and theoretical research”, Structures, vol. 56, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105047.
[5] Wang, Xiaoming,W. Huan, S. Yuan, et al., “Process-independent construction stage analysis of self-anchored suspension bridges”, Automation in Construction, vol. 117, art. no. 103227, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103227.
[6] A. Yonghui, E. Chatzi, S. Sunghan, et al., “Recent progress and future trends on damage identification methods for bridge structures”, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 26, no. 10, art. no. e2416, 2019, doi: 10.1002/stc.2416.
[7] Q. Wenting, M. Biao, L. Qiangwei, et al., “Computer vision-based bridge damage detection using deep convolutional networks with expectation maximum attention module”, Sensors, vol. 21, no. 3, art. no. 824, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21030824.
[8] W. Guangrun, Q. Wenliang, and W. Tianyu, “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger”, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 97, pp. 701-717, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.028.
[9] A.C. Neves, I. González, J. Leander, and R. Karoumi, “Structural health monitoring of bridges: a model-free ANN-based approach to damage detection”, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 7, pp. 689-702, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s13349-017-0252-5.
[10] N. Jianguo, T. Muxuan, F. Jiansheng, “Research on cable anchorage systems for self-anchored suspension bridges with steel box girders”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 633-643, 2011, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000190.
[11] Z. Yu, Z. Yongjun,W. Lingling, et al., “Experiment on the behavior of a self-anchored suspension and cable-stayed hybrid bridge during structural transformation”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 1821-1831, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12205-020-0881-9.
[12] Z. Guangpan, L. Aiqun, L. Jianhui, and D. Maojun, “Structural health monitoring and time-dependent effects analysis of self-anchored suspension bridge with extra-wide concrete girder”, Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, art. no. 115, 2018, doi: 10.3390/app8010115.
[13] C.R. Farrar and D.A. Jauregui, “Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment”, Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 7, no. 5, art. no. 704, 1998, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/013.
[14] R.W. Wickramasinghe, P.D. Thambiratnam, and T.H.T. Chan, “Damage detection in a suspension bridge using modal flexibility method”, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 107, art. no. 104194, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104194.
[15] J.C. Weinstein, M. Sanayei, and B.R. Brenner, “Bridge damage identification using artificial neural networks”, Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 23, no. 11, art. no. 04018084, 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001302.
[16] O. Huth, et al., “Damage identification using modal data: Experiences on a prestressed concrete bridge”, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 131, no. 12, pp. 1898-1910, 2005, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1898).
[17] A. Fernandez-Navamuel, et al., “Supervised deep learning with finite element simulations for damage identification in bridges”, Engineering Structures, vol. 257, art. no. 114016, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114016.
[18] M.G. Masciotta, L.R. Ramos, et al., “A spectrum-driven damage identification technique: Application and validation through the numerical simulation of the Z24 Bridge”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 7071, pp. 578-600, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.027.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
