Casting of Aluminium Foam with Defined Porosity Using DoE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/afe.2025.153770Abstract
Closed cell aluminium foam offers an interesting combination of properties such as high energy absorption, stiffness, strength and low density. These properties give it great potential as an impact absorbing material which can be used in the automotive industry, military, civil engineering and others. To achieve these properties, the structure of the foam is important. The number, shape, regularity and distribution of pores are of great importance. A major disadvantage of aluminium foam is its low viscosity and consequently poor castability. Casting of aluminium metal foam is achieved by a thermally activated chemical reaction of the foaming agent calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Different amounts of foaming agent and reaction times have been used to achieve defined porosity. With regard to process stability and manufacturing cost, optimal parameters to achieve defined porosity were found using DoE (Design of Experiment) methodology. As a result, longer agitation times were found to produce more homogeneous foams as the calcium carbonate powder was better distributed, consequently more calcium carbonate powder needs to be added as it reacts and is consumed when in contact with the melt. Experiments were performed using gravity casting and simple shapes can be made this way. Efforts are currently being made to establish a manufacturing process that can be used to produce castings with defined geometry.References
[1] Rajak, D.K., Gupta, M. (2020). An insight into metal based foams. In Advanced Structured Materials (978-981). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[2] Costanza, G., Solaiyappan, D. & Tata, M.E. (2023). Properties, applications and recent developments of cellular solid materials: a review. Materials. 16(22), 7076, 1-16. ISSN 1996-1944. DOI:10.3390/ma16227076.
[3] Bhuvanesh, M., Costanza, G. & Tata, M.E. (2023). Research progress on mechanical behavior of closed-cell al foams influenced by different TiH2 and SiC additions and correlation porosity-mechanical properties. Applied Sciences. 13(11), 6755, 1-13. DOI:10.3390/app13116755.
[4] Miyoshi, T., Itoh, M., Akiyama S. & Kitahara, A. (1998). Aluminum foam, “Alporas”: the production process, properties and applications. MRS Proceedings. 521, 133. ISSN 0272-9172. DOI:10.1557/PROC-521-133.
[5] Ashby, M., Evans, A.G., Flack, N., Gibson, L.J. (2000). Properties of metal foams. In Metal Foams (pp. 40-54). Elsevier. DOI:10.1016/B978-075067219-1/50006-4.
[6] Simancik, F., Rajner W. & Rainhard, LAAG. (2000). Alulight - aluminum foam for lightweight construction. SAE technical paper series. 2000-03-06. DOI:10.4271/2000-01-0337.
[7] Kriszt, B., Kraft, O. & Clemens, H. (2000). Mikrostruktureigenschaften von Alporas Schaum in Abhängigkeit von thermisch mechanischer Belastung. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik. 31(6), 478-480. ISSN 0933-5137. DOI:/10.1002/1521-4052(200006)31:6478::AID-MAWE4783.0.CO;2-0.
[8] Kulshreshtha, A. & Dhakad, S.K. (2020). Preparation of metal foam by different methods: a review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 26, 1784-1790. ISSN 22147853. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.375.
[9] Lefebvre, L.P., Banhart J. & Dunard, D.C. (2007). Porous Metals and Metallic Foams. DEStech Publications. ISBN 978-1-932078-28-2.
[10] Rajak, D.K., Gupta, M. (2020). Manufacturing Methods of Metal Foams. An Insight Into Metal Based Foams: Processing, Properties and Applications. DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_3.
[11] Banhart, J. (2001). Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Progress in Materials Science. 46(6), 559-632. DOI:10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5.
[12] Byakova, A., Gnyloskurenko, S., Vlasov, A., Yevych Y. & Semenov, N. (2022). The mechanical performance of aluminum foam fabricated by melt processing with different foaming agents: a comparative analysis. Metals. 12(8), 1384, 1-10. ISSN 2075-4701. DOI:10.3390/met12081384.
[13] Durakovic, B. (2017). Design of experiments application, concepts, examples: State of the art. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN). 5(3). DOI:10.21533/pen.v5i3.145.
[14] Uy, M. & Telford, J.K. (2009). Optimization by Design of Experiment techniques. In 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference proceedings, 7-14 March 2009 (pp. 1-10). DOI:10.1109/AERO.2009.4839625.
