Performance characteristics investigation of a solar rankine cycle powered air conditioning system for residential buildings using low GWP working fluids

Authors

  • Youcef Maalem Ecole Nationale Polytechnique de Constantine (ENPC), BP75 A, Nouvelle Ville RP, 25000 Constantine, Alger
  • Hakim Madani LESEI, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Batna 2, 05000 Batna, Algeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ather.2025.154184

Abstract

Screening for eco-friendly working fluids with high-energy efficiency is one of the highest challenges in the air conditioning sector. The present research aims to investigate and compare the performance characteristics of fourteen promising low global warming potential working fluids, less than 150, in solar organic Rankine cycle powered vapour compression cycle for air conditioning of residential buildings. The working fluids selected are R152a, R161, R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R1233zd(E), R290, R1270, R600a, R600, R601a, R601, R13I1, RE170 and R123. The performance characteristics investigated are the organic Rankine cycle efficiency (ηORC), the ratio (WRm) of network output (Wnet) for the organic Rankine cycle to mass flow (mORC) rate for organic Rankine cycle, volumetric flow ratio (VFR), expander size parameter (SP), cooling power (Qeva) of vapour compression cycle, coefficient of performance (COPVCC) of vapour compression cycle, coefficient of performance (COPs) of the organic Rankine cycle–vapour compression cycle system, the ratio (CPRm) of cooling power (Qeva) to (mORC+mVCC), and the total efficiency of solar air conditioning system (ηt). The investigated results proved that the working fluid RE170 (global warming potential = 1) is the most suitable working fluid for the organic Rankine cycle–vapour compression cycle system through the comprehensive comparison of ηORC, WRm, VFR, SP, Qeva, COPVCC , COPs, CPRm and ηt for the fourteen working fluids.

References

1. Maalem, Y., Fedali, S., Madani, H., & Tamene, Y. (2020). Performance analysis of ternary azeotropic mixtures in different vapor compression refrigeration cycles. International Journal of Refrigeration, 119, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.07.021

2. Li, C., Zhou, J., Cao, Y., Zhong, J., Liu, Y., Kang, C., & Tan, Y. (2014). Interaction between urban microclimate and electric air-conditioning energy consumption during high temperature season. Applied Energy, 117, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.057

3. Martins, M., Mauran, S., Stitou, D., & Neveu, P. (2012). A new thermal hydraulic process for solar cooling. Energy, 41, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.030

4. Maalem, Y., & Madani, H. (2024). Energetic performance investigation of ejector air conditioning cycles using the environment friendly gas R161 (fluoroethane) as substitute to the phase-out R22 (chlorodifluoromethane). International Journal of Thermofluid Science and Technology, 11, 110201. https://doi.org/10.36963/IJTST.2024110201

5. Zeyghami, M., Goswami, D. Y., & Stefanakos, E. (2015). A review of solar thermo-mechanical refrigeration and cooling methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1428–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.011

6. Egrican, A. N., & Karakas, A. (1986). Second law analysis of a solar powered Rankine cycle/vapor compression cycle. Journal of Heat Recovery Systems, 6, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-7593(86)90073-1

7. Louajari, M., Mimet, A., & Ouammi, A. (2011). Study of the effect of finned tube adsorber on the performance of solar driven adsorption cooling machine using activated carbon-ammonia pair. Applied Energy, 88, 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.032

8. Luo, H., Wang, R., & Dai, Y. (2010). The effects of operation parameter on the performance of a solar-powered adsorption chiller. Applied Energy, 87, 3018–3022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.03.013

9. Quoilin, S., Orosz, M., Hemond, H., & Lemort, V. (2011). Performance and design optimization of a low-cost solar organic Rankine cycle for remote power generation. Solar Energy, 85, 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.010

10. Tchanche, B. F., Lambrinos, G., Frangoudakis, A., & Papadakis, G. (2011). Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 3963–3979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.024

11. Molés, F., Navarro-Esbrí, J., Peris, B., Mota-Babiloni, A., & Kontomaris, K. (2015). Thermodynamic analysis of a combined ORC and VCC system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 87, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.083

12. Asim, M., Leung, M. K. H., Shan, Z., Li, Y., Leung, D. Y. C., & Ni, M. (2017). Thermodynamic and thermo-economic analysis of integrated ORC. Energy Procedia, 143, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.670

13. Saleh, B. (2016). Parametric and working fluid analysis of combined system. Journal of Advanced Research, 7, 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2016.06.006

14. Aphornratana, S., & Sriveerakul, T. (2010). Combined Rankine–vapour compression cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 2557–2564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.04.016

15. Cihan, E. (2014). Cooling performance investigation of ORC system. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 34(1), 101–109.

16. Bu, X., Wang, L., & Li, H. (2013). Working fluid selection for ORC–VCC. Geothermal Energy, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-9706-1-2

17. Li, H., Bu, X., Wang, L., Long, Z., & Lian, Y. (2013). Hydrocarbon working fluids for combined system. Energy and Buildings, 65, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.012

18. Wang, H., Peterson, R., Harada, K., Miller, E., Ingram-Goble, R., Fisher, L., Yih, J., & Ward, C. (2011). ORC and vapor compression cooling system. Energy, 36, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.020

19. Yue, C., You, F., & Huang, Y. (2016). Thermal and economic analysis of ORC system. International Journal of Refrigeration, 64, 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2016.01.005

20. Hu, B., Guo, J., Yang, Y., & Shao, Y. (2022). Performance analysis of ORC-driven air conditioning. Energy Reports, 8, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.094

21. Kim, K. H., & Perez-Blanco, H. (2015). Combined ORC and VCC for cogeneration. Applied Thermal Engineering, 91, 964–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.062

22. Khatoon, S., Almefreji, N. M. A., & Kim, M. H. (2021). Thermodynamic study of combined system. Energies, 14(2), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020410

23. Jeong, J., & Kang, Y. T. (2004). Refrigeration cycle driven by turbine. International Journal of Refrigeration, 27, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(03)00101-4

24. Küçük, E., & Kılıç, M. (2023). Exergoeconomic analysis of dual-pressure ORC-VCC. Sustainability, 15(8), 6987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086987

25. Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., Xia, X., Zhang, S., Xiao, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, W. (2024). Experimental ORC-VCC performance study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 250, 123534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123534

26. Qureshi, F. M., Chandio, M. W., Memon, A. A., Kumar, L., & Awad, M. M. (2024). Solar-based ORC with refrigeration cycle. Energy Nexus, 14, 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100291

27. Al-Sayyab, A. K. S., Mota-Babiloni, A., & Navarro-Esbrí, J. (2023). Modified compound ORC-VCC system evaluation. Applied Energy, 334, 120651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120651

28. Mota-Babiloni, A., Navarro-Esbrí, J., Barragán, A., Molés, F., & Peris, B. (2014). Performance of R1234yf and R1234ze. Applied Thermal Engineering, 71, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.06.056

29. Calm, J. M., & Hourahan, G. C. (2011). Refrigerants data summary. Proceedings of the 23rd ICR, Prague.

30. Sokhansefat, T., Kasaeian, A., Rahmani, K., Heidari, A. H., Aghakhani, F., & Mahian, O. (2018). Thermoeconomic solar collectors analysis. Renewable Energy, 115, 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.057

31. Li, P., Li, J., Pei, G., Munir, A., & Ji, J. (2016). Cascade ORC using solar and LNG. Solar Energy, 127, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.01.029

32. Yaiche, M. R., Bouhanik, A., Bekkouche, S. M. A., Malek, A., & Benouaz, T. (2014). Solar maps of Algeria. Energy Conversion and Management, 82, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.063

33. Macchi, E., & Perdichizzi, A. (1981). Efficiency prediction for axial-flow turbines. Journal of Engineering for Power, 103, 718–724. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3230794

34. Invernizzi, C., Iora, P., & Silva, P. (2007). Bottoming micro-Rankine cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.05.003

35. Lakew, A. A., & Bolland, O. (2010). Working fluids for low-temperature heat source. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30, 1262–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.02.009

36. Stijepovic, M. Z., Linke, P., Papadopoulos, A. I., & Grujic, A. S. (2012). Role of working fluid properties in ORC. Applied Thermal Engineering, 36, 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.10.057

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Maalem, Youcef, and Hakim Madani. “Performance Characteristics Investigation of a Solar Rankine Cycle Powered Air Conditioning System for Residential Buildings Using Low GWP Working Fluids”. Archives of Thermodynamics, vol. 46, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 97-107, doi:10.24425/ather.2025.154184.

Issue

Section

Articles