Exergoeconomic optimisation of a novel tri-evaporator solar-biomass multigeneration system coupled with fuel cell and electrolyser

Authors

  • Obiora Emeka Anisiji Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Federal University Otuoke, P.M.B. 126, Yenagoa, Nigeria; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, P.M.B. 1221, Effurun, Nigeria
  • Ikuobase Emovon Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, P.M.B. 1221, Effurun, Nigeria
  • Olusegun David Samuel Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, P.M.B. 1221, Effurun, Nigeria
  • Fidelis Abam Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Calabar, P.M.B. 1115, Calabar, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ather.2025.156583

Abstract

This study presents a novel, cost-effective multigeneration system configuration that utilises locally available solar irradiance and biomass resources to produce hydrogen, electricity, heating, hot water, and cooling. The system integrates a range of energy conversion technologies, including non-conventional parabolic trough collectors, conventional biomass gasification, the Kalina cycle, organic Rankine cycle, vapour absorption system, an electrolyser, and a fuel cell. A thermoeconomic analysis was conducted to evaluate system performance, with exergy-based costing applied to determine the operating costs while optimising overall net output. The study also assessed the exergetic sustainability of the system by analysing thermodynamic inefficiencies. It was found that an optimal ambient temperature of approximately 297.4 K maximises the system's exergetic sustainability index, reaching a value of 1.00. The levelized cost of electricity from the Kalina and organic Rankine cycle subsystems was calculated as 0.04308 USD/kWh and 0.0245 USD/kWh, respectively, corresponding to an exergoeconomic factor of 44.51%. When converted to Nigerian currency, these values equate to 69.12 NGN/kWh and 39.31 NGN/kWh − significantly lower than the prevailing electricity tariff in Nigeria, which stands at approximately 209.50 NGN/kWh (0.1306 USD/kWh). Under specified operating conditions, the optimal work outputs of the organic Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle turbines were 47.97 kJ/kg and 435.3 kJ/kg, respectively. The overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated plant were recorded at 52.2% and 16.14%. This multigeneration system demonstrates strong potential as an alternative to fossil-fuel-based power generation, particularly in applications and sectors with low energy demand.

References

[1] Jamali, D.H., & Noorpoor, A. (2019). Optimization of a novel solar-based multi-generation system for waste heat recovery in a cement plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117825

[2] Hosseini, S.S., Mehrpooya, M., Alsagri, A.S., & Alrobaian, A.A. (2019). Introducing, evaluation and exergetic performance assessment of a novel hybrid system composed of MCFC, methanol synthesis process, and a combined power cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 197, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111878

[3] Alsagri, A.S., Chiasson, A., & Aljabr, A. (2018). Performance Comparison and Parametric Analysis of sCO2 Power Cycles Configurations. ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. V06BT08A007. November 9–15, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. doi: 10.1115/imece2018-86843

[4] Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Hosseini, S.S., & Younesi, H. (2016). Najafpour G. Performance analysis of a continuous bioreactor for ethanol and acetate synthesis from syngas via Clostridium ljungdahlii using exergy concept. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(3), 853–865. doi: 10.1007/s10098-015-1061-3

[5] Yuksel, Y.E., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of a geothermal energy based integrated system for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(4), 2530–2546. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.172

[6] Dincer, I. (2000). Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4(2), 157–175. doi: 10.1016/s1364-0321(99)00011-8

[7] Leiva-Illanes, R., Escobar, R., Cardemil, J., Alarcón, P., & Diego, C. (2018). Comparison of the levelized cost and thermoeconomic methodologies – Cost allocation in a solar polygeneration plant to produce power, desalted water, cooling and process heat. Energy Conversion and Management, 168, 215–229. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.107

[8] Kopp, M., Coleman, D., Stiller, C., Scheffer, K., Aichinger, J., & Scheppat, B. (2017). Energiepark Mainz: Technical and economic analysis of the worldwide largest Power-to-Gas plant with PEM electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(19), 13311–13320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.145

[9] Pourrahmani, H., & Moghimi, M. (2019). Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel continuous solar-driven hydrogen production system assisted by phase change material thermal storage system. Energy, 189, 116170. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116170

[10] Ahmadi, P., Dincer, I., & Rosen, M.A. (2014). Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a novel biomass-based integrated energy system. Energy, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.085

[11] Calise, F., d’Accadia, M.D., Macaluso, A., Piacentino, A., & Vanoli, L. (2016). Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel hybrid solar–geothermal polygeneration system producing energy and water. Energy Conversion and Management, 115, 200–220. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.029

[12] Baghernejad, A., Yaghoubi, M., & Jafarpur, K. (2016). Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose. Solar Energy, 134, 165–179. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.046

[13] Moharamian, A., Soltani, S., Rosen, M.A., & Mahmoudi, S.M. (2017). Exergoeconomic and thermodynamic analyses of an externally fired combined cycle with hydrogen and injection to the combustion chamber. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(2), 781–792. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.136

[14] Khalid, F., Dincer, I., & Rosen, M.A. (2017). Thermoeconomic Analysis of a Solar-Biomass Integrated Multigeneration System for a Community. Applied Thermal Engineering, 120, 645–653. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.040

[15] Khanmohammadi, S., Heidarnejad, P., Javani, N., & Ganjehsarabi, H. (2017). Exergoeconomic analysis and multi objective optimization of a solar based integrated energy system for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(33), 21433–21453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.105

[16] El-Emam, R.S., & Dincer, I. (2018). Investigation and assessment of a novel solar-driven integrated energy system. Energy Conversion and Management, 158, 246–255. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.062

[17] Khanmohammadi, S., Saadat-Targhi, M., Al-Rashed, A.A., & Afrand, M. (2019). Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization of harvesting waste heat from a biomass gasifier integrated system by thermoelectric generator. Energy Conversion and Management, 195, 1022–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.075

[18] Behzadi, A., Habibollahzade, A., Zare, V., & Ashjaee, M. (2019). Multi-objective optimization of a hybrid biomass-based SOFC/GT/double effect absorption chiller/RO desalination system with CO2 recycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 181, 302–318. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.053

[19] Anvari, S., Mahian, O., Taghavifar, H., Wongwises, S., & Desideri, U. (2020). 4E analysis of a modified multigeneration system designed for power, heating/cooling, and water desalination. Applied Energy, 270, 115107. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115107

[20] Abdelhay, A.O., Fath, H.E.S., & Nada, S.A. (2020). Solar-driven polygeneration system for power, desalination, and cooling. Energy, 198, 117341. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117341

[21] Alirahmi, S.M., Rostami, M., & Farajollahi, A.H. (2020). Multicriteria design optimization and thermodynamic analysis of a novel multi-generation energy system for hydrogen, cooling, heating, power, and freshwater. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(30), 15047–15062. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.

[22] Khan, M.S., Abid, M., Bashir, M.A., Amber, K.P., Khanmohammadi, S., & Yan, M. (2021). Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel solar-assisted multigenerational system utilizing high temperature phase change material and hybrid nanofluid. Energy Conversion and Management, 236, 113948. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113948

[23] Genc, G.C., Celik, M., & Genc, M.S. (2012). Cost analysis of wind-electrolyzer fuel cell system for energy demand in Pınarbaşı-Kayseri. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(17), 12158–12166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.058

[24] Ahmadi, P., Dincer, I., & Rosen M.A. (2013). Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(4), 1795–1805. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.025

[25] Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., & Moran, M. (1996). Thermal design and optimization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

[26] Tsatsaronis, G., & Lin, L. (1990). On exergy costing in exergoeconomics. Proceedings of computer-aided energy systems analysis, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 25–30 Nov., Dallas, TX, United States.

[27] Aydin, H. (2013). Exergetic sustainability analysis of LM6000 gas turbine power plant with steam cycle. Energy, 57, 766–774. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.018

[28] Midilli, A., & Dincer, I. (2009). Development of some exergetic parameters for PEM fuel cells for measuring environmental impact and sustainability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(9), 3858–3872. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.066

[29] Midilli, A., Inac, S., & Ozsaban, M. (2017). Exergetic sustainability indicators for a high-pressure hydrogen production and storage system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(33), 21379–21391. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.299

[30] Kotas, T.J. (1995). The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis. Reprint Edition, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida.

[31] Engineering Equation Solver (EES), 2013. Klein, S.A. from fchart.com/ees/.

[32] Parikhani, T., Gholizadeh, T., Ghaebi, H., Sadat, S.M., & Sarabi, M. (2018). Exergoeconomic optimization of a novel multigeneration system driven by geothermal heat source and liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.181

[33] Ozturk, M., & Dincer, I. (2013). Thermodynamic analysis of a solar-based multi-generation system with hydrogen production. Applied Thermal Engineering, 51(42), 1235–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.0

[34] Karaca, A.E., & Dincer, I. (2020). A new integrated solar energy based system for residential houses. Energy Conversion and Management, 221, 113112. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113112

[35] Khanmohammadi, S., Heidarnejad, P., Javani, N., & Ganjehsarabi, H. (2017). Exergoeconomic analysis and multi objective optimization of a solar based integrated energy system for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(33), 21443–21453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.105

[36] Hashemian, N., & Noorpoor, A. (2019). Assessment and multicriteria optimization of a solar and biomass-based multi-generation system: Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental aspects. Energy Conversion and Management, 195, 788–797. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.039

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Anisiji, Obiora Emeka, et al. “Exergoeconomic Optimisation of a Novel Tri-Evaporator Solar-Biomass Multigeneration System Coupled With Fuel Cell and Electrolyser”. Archives of Thermodynamics, vol. 46, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 113-26, doi:10.24425/ather.2025.156583.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.