Influence of partial shading on performance of a V-trough CPV system with various truncation levels

Authors

  • Stanisława Halon Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27, Wroclaw, 50-370, Poland
  • Natalia Stabrowska Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27, Wroclaw, 50-370, Poland
  • Paweł Pacyga Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27, Wroclaw, 50-370, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ather.2025.156591

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the performance of a fixed concentrated photovoltaics system consisting of a photovoltaics module coupled with V-trough concentrators under partial shading conditions. V-troughs had the same trough angles, but different truncation levels (reflector lengths). Their geometric concentration ratios were 2.35 and 1.80. Research covers a wide range of operating parameters - generated power, electrical efficiency, module’s average temperature, and characteristic curves - offering a unique multidimensional experimental comparison of concentrated photovoltaics performance with V-troughs of different truncation. The objective is to determine a relationship between the V-trough geometry, working conditions, and generated power. Findings reveal that the maximum power point and short-circuit current are strong functions of the truncation level and angle of incidence. For angles close to 0°, these parameters reach greater values at lower truncation. At higher angles, this trend reverses. While concentrator-integrated systems have a higher peak power than the bare module (by 23% and 18% for the longer and shorter concentrators, respectively), they experience greater temporal fluctuations in operational parameters due to shading. Their daily average power production was comparable to that of the bare module as shading cast by V-trough reflectors led to a loss in the instantaneous generated power of up to 45% compared to the system with no concentrator. Thus, among the tested concentrators, the shorter one is more cost-effective due to reduced material consumption. Additionally, the maximum power of concentrator-integrated systems was produced when the module temperature reached 70ºC, rather than when the solar irradiance was maximum.

References

[1] Sangani, C.S., & Solanki, C.S. (2007). Experimental evaluation of V-trough (2 suns) PV concentrator system using commercial PV modules. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 91, 453–459. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.012

[2] Alnajideen, M., & Gao, M. (2022). A new configuration of V-trough concentrator for achieving improved concentration ratio of >3.0x. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 245, 111877. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111877

[3] Franklin, E., & Coventry, J. (2002). Effects of Highly Non-uniform Illumination Distribution on Electrical Performance of Solar Cells. 40th Annual Conference for the Australian New Zealand Solar Energy Society, Newcastle, Australia.

[4] Ustaoglu, A., Ozbey, U., & Torlaklı, H. (2020). Numerical investigation of concentrating photovoltaic/thermal (CPV/T) system using compound hyperbolic-trumpet, V-trough and compound parabolic concentrators. Renewable Energy, 152, 1192–1208. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.094

[5] Singh, H., Sabry, M., & Redpath, D. (2016). Experimental investigations into low concentrating line axis solar concentrators for CPV applications. Solar Energy, 136, 421–427. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2016.07.029

[6] Ustaoglu, A., Akgül, V., & Okajima, J. (2023). Performance investigation of truncated low concentrating photovoltaic-thermal systems with V-trough, compound hyperbolic and compound parabolic concentrators. Applied Thermal Engineering, 232, 121028. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121028

[7] Hadavinia, H., & Singh, H. (2019). Modelling and experimental analysis of low concentrating solar panels for use in building integrated and applied photovoltaic systems. Renewable Energy, 139, 815–829. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.121

[8] Hadavinia, H. (2018). Modelling and Experimental Analysis of Low Concentrating Photovoltaic for Use in Building Integrated and Attached Photovoltaic Systems. Brunel University London.

[9] Zhang, Y., Su, J., Zhang, C., Lang, Z., Yang, M., & Tingkun, G. (2021). Performance estimation of photovoltaic module under partial shading based on explicit analytical model. Solar Energy, 224, 327–340. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.019

[10] Bharadwaj, P., & John, V. (2019). Subcell modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic modules. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 55(3), 3046–3054. doi:10.1109/TIA.2019.2899813

[11] Brecl, K., Bokalic, M., & Topic, M. (2021). Annual energy losses due to partial shading in PV modules with cut wafer-based Si solar cells. Renewable Energy, 168, 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.059

[12] Jacobson, M.Z., & Jadhav, V. (2018). World estimates of PV optimal tilt angles and ratios of sunlight incident upon tilted and tracked PV panels relative to horizontal panels. Solar Energy, 169, 55–66. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.030

[13] Parupudi, R.V., Singh, H., & Kolokotroni, M. (2020). Low Concentrating Photovoltaics (LCPV) for buildings and their performance analyses. Applied Energy, 279, 115839. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115839

[14] Bahaidarah, H.M., Tanweer, B., Gandhidasan, P., & Rehman, S. (2015). A combined optical, thermal and electrical performance study of a V-trough PV system—Experimental and analytical investigations. Energies, 8, 2803–2827. doi:10.3390/en8042803

[15] Rabl, A. (1976). Comparison of solar concentrators. Solar Energy, 18, 93–111. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(76)90043-8

[16] Madala, S., & Boehm, R.F. (2017). A review of nonimaging solar concentrators for stationary and passive tracking applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 309–323. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.058

[17] Ustaoglu, A., Kandilli, C., Cakmak, M., & Torlaklı, H. (2020). Experimental and economical performance investigation of V-trough concentrator with different reflectance characteristic in photovoltaic applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 123072.

[18] Gómez-Gil, F.J., Wang, X., & Barnett, A. (2012). Energy production of photovoltaic systems: Fixed, tracking, and concentrating. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 306–313. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.156

[19] Hussein, L.A., Ayadi, O., & Fathi, M. (2021). Performance comparison for sun-tracking mechanism photovoltaic and concentrated photovoltaic solar panels with fixed system panels. International Renewable Engineering Conference, Amman, Jordan. doi:10.1109/IREC51415.2021.9427808

[20] Concepcion, N.D.G., Villanueva, A.R., Dalumpines, A.K., Magwili, G., & Pacis, M.C. (2020). Design of an Azimuth-Altitude Dual Axis Tracking System for solar harvesting using photovoltaic V-trough concentrator. IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium, Malaysia. doi:10.1109/ICSGRC49013.2020.9232608

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Halon, Stanisława, et al. “Influence of Partial Shading on Performance of a V-Trough CPV System With Various Truncation Levels”. Archives of Thermodynamics, vol. 46, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 199-11, doi:10.24425/ather.2025.156591.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.