Numerical investigation of a two-stage ejector based on a constant rate of momentum change: performance analysis and optimisation

Authors

  • Arvind Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.R. Mangalam University, Gurugram 122001, India
  • Surendra Kumar Yadav Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.R. Mangalam University, Gurugram 122001, India
  • Virendra Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malviya University, Gorakhpur 273016, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ather.2025.156597

Abstract

A two-stage ejector based on a constant rate of momentum change is a geometrical arrangement of a single-stage ejector to further improve its performance, utilising water vapour as a working fluid for both primary and secondary flows. Creating an additional secondary inlet in the single-stage ejector helps to further entrain the secondary mass flow, resulting in a better entrainment ratio. The present study utilises the constant rate of momentum change, and a 1D gas dynamic approach to compute the geometrical profile and flow parameters using MATLAB. The numerical software ANSYS Fluent 18.0 is utilised to analyse the two-stage ejector geometry. The global performance ejector entrainment was computed at on and off design conditions. The results show that the two-stage ejector entrainment ratio is significantly higher than that of the previously studied single-stage ejector. The entrainment ratio of the two-stage ejector increases to reach the on-design value of operating conditions, and then starts decreasing.

References

1. Ma X., Sun W., Ma S., Zhang H., Zhang Y., Liu C., Jia L., Xue H.: A streamlining method for ejector nozzle profile optimization based on polynomial function. Applied Thermal Engineering, 219 (A), 119380, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119380

2. Muzaber A., Bassmaji N., Kaddah A.: A new mixing chamber geometry design for supersonic ejector performance optimization using computational fluid dynamics. International Journal of Thermofluids, 101047, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2024.101047

3. Zheng L., Wang W., Zhang Y., Wang L., Lu W.: Optimization Analysis of the Mixing Chamber and Diffuser of Ejector Based on Fano Flow Model. Computer Modelling in Engineering & Sciences, 133(1), 153–170, 2022. doi:10.32604/cmes.2022.021235

4. Yan J., Li Z., Zhang H.: Investigation on key geometries optimization and effect of variable operating conditions of a transcritical R744 two-phase ejector. Applied Thermal Engineering, 230, 120733, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120733

5. Kumar V., Singhal G., Subbarao P.M.V.: Study of supersonic flow in a constant rate of momentum change (CRMC) ejector with frictional effects. Applied Thermal Engineering, 60(1–2), 61–71, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.06.045

6. Seth B., Knecht S., Szalai M., Haußmann J.: Design of a variable passive ejector for hydrogen recirculation of a PEM fuel cell system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 99, 956–965, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.091

7. Khennich M., Galanis N., Sorin M., Orfi J., Sarrafi A., Dupuis S.: Thermodynamic analysis of a solar powered ejector cooling system. International Journal of Thermofluids, 24, 100960, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100960

8. Kanbur B.B., Kriezi E.E., Markussen W.B., Kærn M.R., Busch A., Kristófersson J.: Framework for prediction of two-phase R-744 ejector performance based on integration of thermodynamic models with multiphase mixture CFD simulations. Applied Thermal Engineering, 258 (C), 124888, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124888

9. Ogaili H.H., Khalilarya S., Chitsaz A., Mojaver P.: Energy, exergy, and economic performance analysis of integrated parabolic trough collector with organic Rankine cycle and ejector refrigeration cycle. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 25, 100843, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100843

10. Fabris F., Bodys J., Marinetti S., Minetto S., Smołka J., Rossetti A.: Numerical modelling of a single-compression multi-temperature ejector-supported R744 refrigeration unit for last mile delivery. International Journal of Refrigeration, 160, 65–75, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.01.014

11. Gagan J., Śmierciew K., Pawluczuk A., Łukaszuk M., Dudar A., Butrymowicz D.: The first experimental tests of novel bivalent hybrid ejector-compressor refrigeration system. Energy, 317, 134646, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.134646

12. Fingas R., Haida M., Smolka J., Croci L., Bodys J., Palacz M., Besagni G.: Experimental analysis of the R290 variable geometry ejector with a spindle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 258 (C), 124632, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124632

13. Paul S., Srikar Reddy P., Rao S.M., Kumar P.: Surrogate model based multi-objective optimisation of supercritical CO₂ ejectors. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 218, 106493, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2024.106493

14. Siddique S.M., Uzzaman M.M., Ehsan M.M., Khan Y.: Thermal analysis of a novel configuration of double effect absorption system cascaded with ejector and injection enhanced compression refrigeration cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 326, 119435, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119435

15. Li M., Xu L., Gong H.: Examination of an ejector-enhanced geothermal plant for power generation improvement. Renewable Energy, 242, 122400, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122400

16. Kong F., Kim H.D.: Analytical and computational studies on the performance of a two-stage ejector–diffuser system. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 85, 71–87, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.117

17. Ding Z., Wang L., Zhao H., Zhang H., Wang C.: Numerical study and design of a two-stage ejector for subzero refrigeration. Applied Thermal Engineering, 108, 436–448, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.104

18. Kong F., Kim H.D.: Optimization study of a two-stage ejector–diffuser system. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 101, 1151–1162, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.129

19. Chen G., Zhang R., Zhu D., Chen S., Fang L., Hao X.: Experimental study on two-stage ejector refrigeration system driven by two heat sources. International Journal of Refrigeration, 74, 295–303, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2016.10.010

20. Yan J., Wen N., Wang L., Li X., Liu Z., Li S.: Optimization on ejector key geometries of a two-stage ejector-based multi-evaporator refrigeration system. Energy Conversion and Management, 175, 142–150, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.110

21. Baek S., Song S.: Numerical study for the design optimization of a two-phase ejector with R134a refrigerant. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32, 4231–4236, 2018

22. Aidoun Z., Ameur K., Falsafioon M., Badache M.: Current advances in ejector modeling, experimentation and applications for refrigeration and heat pumps. Part 2: Two-phase ejectors. Inventions, 4(1), 16, 2019. doi:10.3390/inventions4010016

23. Suvarnakuta N., Pianthong K., Sriveerakul T., Seehanam W.: Performance analysis of a two-stage ejector in an ejector refrigeration system using CFD. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14(1), 669–682, 2020. doi:10.1080/19942060.2020.1756913

24. Yadav S.K., Pandey K.M., Kumar V., Gupta R.: Computational analysis of a supersonic two-stage ejector. Materials Today: Proceedings, 38, 2700–2705, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.483

25. Bai T., Lu Y., Yan G., Yu J.: Performance analysis of an ejector enhanced two-stage auto-cascade refrigeration cycle for low temperature freezer. Journal of Thermal Science, 30, 2015–2026, 2021. doi:10.1007/s11630-020-1290-6

26. Kumar A., Kumar V., Subbarao P.M.V., Yadav S.K., Singhal G.: Numerical assessment on the performance of variable area single- and two-stage ejectors. Proc. IMechE Part E, 236(1), 114–125, 2022. doi:10.1177/09544089211033129

27. Wang X., Wang L., Song Y., Deng J., Zhan Y.: Optimal design of two-stage ejector for subzero refrigeration system on fishing vessel. Applied Thermal Engineering, 187, 116565, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116565

28. Yang D., Li Y., Xie J., Wang J.: Exergy destruction characteristics of transcritical CO₂ two-stage compression/ejector system. Energy Reports, 8, 8546–8562, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.066

29. Chen L., Xu K., Yang Z., Yan Z., Dong Z.: Optimal design and operation of dual-ejector PEMFC hydrogen system. Energies, 15(15), 5427, 2022. doi:10.3390/en15155427

30. Ringstad K.E., Banasiak K., Ervik Å., Hafner A.: Swirl-Bypass Nozzle for CO₂ two-phase ejectors: numerical design exploration. Energies, 15(18), 6765, 2022. doi:10.3390/en15186765

31. Udroiu C.M., Mota-Babiloni A., Giménez-Prades P., Barragán-Cervera Á., Navarro-Esbrí J.: Two-stage cascade ejector refrigeration. International Journal of Thermofluids, 17, 100287, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100287

32. Suvarnakuta, N., Pianthong, K., Sriveerakul, T., & Seehanam, W. (2020). Performance analysis of a two-stage ejector in an ejector refrigeration system using computational fluid dynamics. Engi-neering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14(1), 669−682. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2020.1756913

33. Ünal Ş., Erdinç M.T., Akgün H., Bilgili M.: Effects of alternative refrigerants on ejector dimensions. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 143, 106685, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106685

34. Pang J., Ge Z., Zhang Y., Du X.: Comparative designs and optimizations of steam ejector. Applied Thermal Engineering, 226, 120345, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120345

35. Han Q., Liu C., Xue H., Zhang H., Sun W., Sun W., Jia L.: Performance optimization of two-stage ejector. Energy, 282, 128376, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128376

36. Yadav S.K., Pandey K.M., Gupta R., Kumar V.: Numerical study of CRMC ejector. J. Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 43(496), 1–14, 2021. doi:10.1007/s40430-021-03207-x

37. Ariafar K., Buttsworth D., Al-Doori G., Malpress R.: Effect of mixing on wet steam ejectors. Energy, 93, 2030–2041, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.082

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Kumar, Arvind, et al. “Numerical Investigation of a Two-Stage Ejector Based on a Constant Rate of Momentum Change: Performance Analysis and Optimisation”. Archives of Thermodynamics, vol. 46, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 7-17, doi:10.24425/ather.2025.156597.

Issue

Section

Articles