A Ten-Year Bibliometric Analysis of Emotional Responses to Products as Indicators of User Acceptance

Authors

  • Lina Dianati Fathimahhayati Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Fitri Trapsilawati Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ardiyanto Ardiyanto Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Herianto Herianto Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2024.153111

Abstract

The study employs a bibliometric approach, analyzing global literature from the Scopus database related to user acceptance based on emotional responses to products. Initially, 749 documents were identified, narrowed down to 378 final-stage journal articles published in English. The data collected comprises information from the last 10 years (2013–2023). These were analyzed using Vos Viewer for bibliometric network visualization and R-biblioshiny for additional analysis. The research, conducted in November 2023, used the following specific search strings (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Emotional response”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (product* OR device*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (measur* OR assess* OR evaluat*)). The study highlights the increasing research on emotional responses to products, with a 9.6% annual growth in publications. While the USA, UK, Spain, and Australia lead in this field. Five topic clusters identified involve emotional response measurement, behavior related to product acceptability, the user of the product, behavioral symptoms, and emotion psychology. Emerging areas include consumer goods and product design, with a future focus on physiological assessment, emotional reaction’s impact on design, and consumer purchase intentions. Density visualization suggests further exploration in wearable technology, purchase intentions, and emotional response measurements like electroencephalography, electromyography, electrophysiology, facial expression, and skin conductance.

References

Agbo, F.J., Oyelere, S.S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2021). Scientific production and thematic breakthroughs in smart learning environments: A bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 8 (1), Article 1. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-020-00145-4

Andersen, C.A., Kring, M.L., Andersen, R.H., Larsen, O.N., Kjær, T.W., Kidmose, U., Møller, S., & Kidmose, P. (2019). EEG discrimination of perceptually similar tastes. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 97(3), 241–252. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24281

Ares, G., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Cadena, R.S., Giménez, A., Pineau, B., Hunter, D.C., Paisley, A.G., & Jaeger, S.R. (2014). Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: Rate-allthat-apply (RATA). Food Quality and Preference, 36, 87–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.03.006

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), 959–975. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Ba Awain, A.M.S., Al-Ansi, A.M., & Jaboob, M. (2023). Green Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Review of Research, Applications and Future Directions. Management and Production Engineering Review. DOI: 10.24425/mper.2023.147194

Brimelow, R.E., Thangavelu, K., Beattie, R., & Dissanayaka, N.N. (2022). Feasibility of Group-Based Multiple Virtual Reality Sessions to Reduce Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Persons Living in Residential Aged Care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 23 (5), 831-837.e2. Scopus. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.026

Briner, R.B., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. In D.M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management (p. 0). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/97801997 63986.013.0007

Burnham, J.F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3 (1), 1. DOI: 10.1186/ 1742-5581-3-1

Cahlik, T. (2000). Comparison of the Maps of Science. Scientometrics, 49 (3), 373–387. DOI: 10.1023/A:101058 1421990

Calvo-Porral, C., Ruiz-Vega, A., & Lévy-Mangin, J.-P. (2018). Does product involvement influence how emotions drive satisfaction?: An approach through the Theory of Hedonic Asymmetry. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24 (3), 130– 136. DOI: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2018.06.001

Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (1), 146–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

Colovic, G. (2011). 4–Ergonomic workplace. In G. Colovic (Ed.), Management of Technology Systems in Garment Industry (pp. 80–105). Woodhead Publishing India. DOI: 10.1533/9780857094049.80

da Quinta, N., Baranda, A., Ríos, Y., Llorente, R., Naranjo, A.B., & Martinez de Marańón, I. (2023). Children’s physiological and behavioural response evoked by the observation, olfaction, manipulation, and consumption of food textures. Part 1: Liquid products. Food Research International, 165. Scopus. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112495

Daim, T.U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (8), 981–1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.004

Della Corte, V., Aria, M., Del Gaudio, G., Sepe, F., & Di Taranto, E. (2022). Stakeholder value creation: A case of the hospitality industry. Corporate Ownership and Control, 19 (1, special issue), 314–326. DOI: 10.22495/cocv19i1siart8

Desmet, P. (2004). Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products. In M. A. Blythe, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment (pp. 111–123). Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_12

Desmet, P.M.A. (2007). NINE SOURCES OF PRODUCT EMOTION. International Association of Societies of Design Research.

Esfahani, H., Tavasoli, K., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Big data and social media: A scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3 (3), 145–164.

Fernandes, T.F.D.C., Ferreira, N.B., Campagnoli, R.R., Gomes, F.D.S., Braga, F., David, I.A., & Lobo, I. (2022). Impact of textual warnings on emotional brain responses to ultra-processed food products. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9. Scopus. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022. 895317

Gao, Y., Chonpracha, P., Li, B., & Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2023). Effects of other people’s facial emotional expression on consumers’ perceptions of chocolate chip cookies containing cricket protein. Journal of Food Science, 88, 185–204. Scopus. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16469

Güven, F.H., & Dem Rkale, B.L. (2018). Determination of global research activities in mechanical engineering via bibliometric analysis. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 65 (1), 171–188. DOI: 10.24425/119414

Helander, M.G. (2002). Hedonomics - Affective Human Factors Design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46 (12), 978–982. DOI: 10.1177/154193120204601209

Jaeger, S.R., Cardello, A.V., Jin, D., Ryan, G.S., & Giacalone, D. (2023). Consumer perception of plantbased yoghurt: Sensory drivers of liking and emotional, holistic and conceptual associations. Food Research International, 167. Scopus. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112666

Jordan, P.W. (2000). Designing Pleasurable Products. In Designing Pleasurable Products. Taylor and Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780203305683

Juodeikiene, G., Trakselyte-Rupsiene, K., Navickaite, B., Zadeike, D., Bendoraitiene, J., Bartkiene, E., Lele, V., Rueller, L., Robert, J., Arnoldi, A., Aiello, G., & Glasner, C. (2021). Functionalization of soya press cake (okara) by ultrasonication for enhancement of submerged fermentation with Lactobacillus paracasei LUHS244 for wheat bread production. LWT, 152. Scopus. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112337

Kalakoski, V. (2019). Cognitive Ergonomics is a Matter of Cognitive Factors. ReCogErg@ECCC.

Köster, E.P., & Mojet, J. (2015). From mood to food and from food to mood: A psychological perspective on the measurement of food-related emotions in consumer research. Food Research International, 76, 180–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.006

Kreibig, S.D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84 (3), 394–421. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010

Kring, A.M., & Gordon, A.H. (1998). Sex Differences in Emotion: Expression, Experience, and Physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (3), 686–703. Scopus. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686

Lagast, S., Gellynck, X., Schouteten, J.J., De Herdt, V., & De Steur, H. (2017). Consumers’ emotions elicited by food: A systematic review of explicit and implicit methods. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 69, 172–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.09.006

Laohakangvalvit, T., Sripian, P., Nakagawa, Y., Feng, C., Tazawa, T., Sakai, S., & Sugaya, M. (2023). Study on the Psychological States of Olfactory Stimuli Using Electroencephalography and Heart Rate Variability. Sensors, 23 (8). Scopus. DOI: 10.3390/s23084026

Maguire, M., & Bevan, N. (2002). User Requirements Analysis. In J. Hammond, T. Gross, & J. Wesson (Eds.), Usability: Gaining a Competitive Edge (pp. 133–148). Springer US. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35610-5_9

Mauss, I.B., & Robinson, M.D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition and Emotion, 23 (2), 209– 237. DOI: 10.1080/02699930802204677

Mougenot, B., & Doussoulin, J.-P. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Global trends in developed and developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-02974-y

Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71

Platz, P., & Veres, Z. (2014). Understanding Consumer Preference Biases. 1.

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9 (1), Article 1. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010012

Rini, L., Lagast, S., Schouteten, J.J., Gellynck, X., & De Steur, H. (2022). Impact of emotional state on consumers’ emotional conceptualizations of dark chocolate using an emoji-based questionnaire. Food Quality and Preference, 99. Scopus. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104547

Shafin, N., Ismail, C.A.N., Mustafa, M.Z., Ghani, N., Ahmad, A.H., Othman, Z., Wijaya, A., & Zakaria, R. (2022). Thematic analysis of multiple sclerosis research by enhanced strategic diagram. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 28 (14), 2160–2170. DOI: 10.1177/1352458 5221075542

Shah, T. (2021). Emotional Aspect of Product Design: An overview. 11, 168–178.

Sharma, K., Kodhati, P., & Sukhavasi, S. (2023). Emotional Marketing On Consumer Behaviour – Perception Study. 10, 01–08.

Shaw, S.D., & Bagozzi, R.P. (2018). The neuropsychology of consumer behavior and marketing. Consumer Psychology Review, 1 (1), 22–40. DOI: 10.1002/arcp.1006

Spinelli, S., Masi, C., Dinnella, C., Zoboli, G.P., & Monteleone, E. (2014). How does it make you feel? A new approach to measuring emotions in food product experience. Food Quality and Preference, 37, 109–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.11.009

Syahid, H.F., & Setyanto, R.P. (2019). The Effect Of Emotions on The Repurchase Intention Mediation By eWOM. 5.

Syed, A.H., & Khan, T. (2022). Evolution of research trends in artificial intelligence for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis over the past two decades: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, 854927. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854927

Thomson, D.M.H., Crocker, C., & Marketo, C.G. (2010). Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate. Food Quality and Preference, 21 (8), 1117–1125. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.04.011

van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Wangphanich, P., & Kongprasert, N. (2022). An Innovative Design Approach for Charcoal Briquette Packaging Design to Meet Customer Requirements. Management and Production Engineering Review, 3–15. DOI: 10.24425/mper.2022.142390

Wijaya, A., Setiawan, N.A., & Shapiai, M.I. (2023). Mapping Research Themes and Future Directions in Learning Style Detection Research: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21 (4), 274–285. DOI: 10.34190/ejel.21.4.3097

Williams, J., & Lynn, S. (2010). Acceptance: An Historical and Conceptual Review. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 30, 5–56. DOI: 10.2190/IC.30.1.c

Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Deng, S., Zhu, T., & Yu, B. (2024). Bibliometric and visual analysis of heavy metal health risk assessment: Development, hotspots and trends. Archives of Environmental Protection. DOI: 10.24425/ aep.2024.149432

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Fathimahhayati, Lina Dianati, et al. “A Ten-Year Bibliometric Analysis of Emotional Responses to Products As Indicators of User Acceptance”. Management and Production Engineering Review, vol. 15, no. 4, Dec. 2024, pp. 1-12, doi:10.24425/mper.2024.153111.

Issue

Section

Artykuły