Antibody level comparison after porcine epidemic diarrhea vaccination via different immunization routes

Authors

  • C. Hu Pulike Biological Engineering Inc., Luoyang, Henan, 471000, China
  • X. Xie Yiyang Vocational and Technical College, Yiyang, Hunan, 413055, China
  • D. Zhao College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, 410128, China
  • H. Liu Pulike Biological Engineering Inc., Luoyang, Henan, 471000, China
  • X. Liu Xiangtan Center for Animal Disease Prevention and Control, Xiangtan, Hunan, 411104, China
  • T. Yang College of Life Sciences and Resource Environment, Yichun University, Yichun, Jiangxi, 336000, China
  • W. Sun Sinopharm Animal Health Corporation Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, 430075, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2024.149342

Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) is a disease extremely harmful to pig health. Intramuscular and Houhai acupoint injections are the main immunization routes to prevent and control PED. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these two routes in pregnant sows based on serum IgG, IgA, and neutralizing antibody levels. PED virus (PEDV) immunoprophylaxis with live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines was administered. The vaccinations for the intramuscular injections elevated IgG and neutralizing antibody levels more than Houhai acupoint injections at most timepoints after immunization. However, the anti-PEDV IgA antibodies induced by vaccination with the two immunization routes did not differ significantly. In conclusion, intramuscular injections are better than Houhai acupoint injections for PEDV vaccination of pregnant sows.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Hu, C., et al. “Antibody Level Comparison After Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Vaccination via Different Immunization Routes”. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 143-6, doi:10.24425/pjvs.2024.149342.

Issue

Section

Article