Внутрішня форма слова в дзеркалі контрастивної лексикології (на матеріалі словацької та української мов)

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/slo.2025.156317

Abstrakt

One of the important onomasiological parameters of the contrastive study of the vocabulary of related languages is the internal form of the compared lexical units, which reflects the originality of thinking and worldview of each of the nation. Using Slovak and Ukrainian lexicon material, semantically equivalent nominative units have been analyzed in terms of their internal form. The factual material was classified into the following groups: 1) the Slovak unit has an internal form – the Ukrainian one does not; 2) the Slovak unit does not have an internal form – the Ukrainian one does; 3) both the Slovak and Ukrainian units do not have an internal form; 4) the Slovak and Ukrainian units, while having a common internal form, have different external forms; 5) the Slovak and Ukrainian units have different internal and external forms. The fifth group is of the greatest academic interest for contrastive lexicology; in the process of studying the correlative pairs of this group, connections were identified in which the motivators of the studied pairs of words are located – synonymous, antonymic, hyponymous-hyperonymic, conversive; a significant part of them belongs to the common lexical-semantic field.

Bibliografia

Bubleynyk L. V., Movna kartyna svitu: leksykolohichni vymiry, [v:] L. V. Bubleynyk, Vybrani pratsi, Lutsʹk 2013.

Bubleynik L. V., Problemy kontrastivnoy leksikologii: ukrainskiy i russkiy yazyki, 2-e izd., Lutsk 2015.

Bubleynyk L. V., Pro znachennya sposobu nominatsiyi v mizhmovnykh leksyko-semantychnykh vidnoshennyakh, [v:] L. V. Bubleynyk, Vybrani pratsi, Lutsʹk 2013.

Bunhanych P., Slovatsʹko-ukrayinsʹkyy slovnyk, Bratyslava 1985.

Humboldt V., O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskikh yazykov i ego vliyaniy na duhovnoe razvitie chelovecheskogo roda, [v:] Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu, Moskva 1984.

Ermakova O. P., Zemskaya E. A., Sopostavitelʹnoe izuchenie slovoobrazovaniya i vnutrennyaya forma slova, «Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka» 1985, t. 44, № 6.

Furdík J., Slovenská slovotvorba (teória, opis, cvičenia), Prešov 2004.

Kocherhan M. P., Osnovy zistavnoho movoznavstva, Kyyiv 2006.

Kotorova E. G., Mezh˝yazykovaya ekvivalentnost v leksicheskoy semantike: sopostavitelʹnoe issledovanie russkogo i nemetskogo yazykov, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin etc. 1998.

Luchyk A. A., Ukrayinsʹke zistavne movoznavstvo: stan i perspektyvy, «Movoznavstvo» 2014, № 6.

Manakin V. N., Sopostavitelʹnaya leksikologiya, Kiev 2004.

Manakin V. M., Vnutrishnya forma slova v aspektakh zistavnoho movoznavstva, «Movoznavstvo» 2014, № 5.

Ološtiak M., Pakhomova S., Onomaziologická komparácia slovenčiny a ukrajinčiny (na príklade komunikačného registra COVID-19), [v:] Slovanská slovotvorba: synchrónia, inovácie, neologizácia, Prešov 2022.

Potebnya A. A., Myslʹ i yazyk, Moskva 1999.

Reformatskiy A. A., O sopostavitelʹnom metode, [v:] A. A. Reformatskiy, Lingvistika i poetika, Moskva 1987.

Rusanivsʹkyy V. M., Struktura leksychnoyi i hramatychnoyi semantyky, Kyyiv 1988.

Rusanivsʹkyy V. M., Svitohlyad i mova, «Movoznavstvo» 1989, № 2.

Serednytsʹka A., Vnutrishnya forma slova yak chastyna movnoyi kartyny svitu, «Aktualʹni pytannya humanitarnykh nauk» 2020, vyp. 27, t. 4.

Shpitʹko I. M., Ukrayinsʹko-slovatsʹki leksychni (ne)paraleli, [v:] Slovensko-ukrajinské vzťahy v oblasti jazyka, literatúry a kultúry na Slovensku a v stredoeurópskom priestore. 70 rokov prešovskej ukrajinistiky na Slovensku, Prešov 2024.

Tungusheva I. A., Vnutrennyaya forma slova i prichiny ee utraty, Blagoveschensk 2010.

Opublikowane

2025-12-22

Jak cytować

Пахомова, Світлана. „Внутрішня форма слова в дзеркалі контрастивної лексикології (на матеріалі словацької та української мов)”. Slavia Orientalis, t. 74, nr 3, grudzień 2025, s. 91–102, doi:10.24425/slo.2025.156317.

Numer

Dział

Językoznawstwo