Experimental of buckling restrained brace hysteretic performance with carbon fiber wrapped in concrete

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2024.148926

Abstract

Buckling restrained brace is an important structure for improving the seismic resistance of structures. Conducting research on new types of buckling restrained brace can improve the seismic performance and reliability of buckling resistant support. Four different types of buckling restrained braces specimens were designed and manufactured: cross-shaped square steel pipe members, cross-shaped round steel pipe members, cross-shaped carbon fiber members, and in-line carbon fiber members. By conducting quasi-static tests, the force displacement hysteresis curves, skeleton curves, stiffness degradation, equivalent viscous damping coefficient, and energy dissipation ratio of four different types of buckling restrained brace were analyzed. The research results showed that all four buckling restrained brace specimens have good hysteresis performance. The load-bearing capacity and energy consumption performance of the three specimens of square steel pipe, round steel pipe and carbon fiber with the same core unit are the same, but the inline type is worse than the cross type. The core unit specimen with a width of 80 mm is about 60% higher in bearing capacity and energy consumption than a specimen with a width of 50 mm. The core unit of some specimens undergoes multi-wave buckling. For carbon fiber specimens, the CFRP is prone to breakage due to the lateral thrust of the restraining unit. Therefore, steel hoop or stirrup should be added to the end to improve the restraint effect when designing and manufacturing.

References

[1] Y. Li, J. Li, T. Guo, et al., “Bearing capacity and seismic performance of Y-shaped reinforced concrete bridge piers in a freeze-thaw environment”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 367–384, 2023, doi: 10.24425/ace.2023.144178.

[2] Y. Zhou, W. Tian, and Y. Xiao, “Design recommendations for self-centering buckling restrained braces”, Engineering Structures, vol. 273, no. 15, art. no. 115019, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115019.

[3] L. Peng, “Research on the energy dissipation of new all-steel buckling restrained brace”, M.A. thesis, Hunan University, 2018.

[4] D. Miller and L. Fahnestock, “Self-centering buckling restrained braces for advanced seismic performance”, in Proceedings of the 2011 Structures Congress. ASCE, 2011, pp. 960–970, doi: 10.1061/41171(401)85.

[5] H. Kim, H. Lee, and K. Ju, “Subassemblage test of buckling restrained braces with H-shaped steel core”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 243–256, 2015, doi: 10.1002/tal.1164.

[6] C. Chou, Y. Chen, D. Pham, and V. Truong, “Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics modeling and seismic demands”, Engineering Structures, vol. 72, pp. 26–40, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.022.

[7] H. Wu, “Effects of restraining ratio on hysteretic performance of concrete-filled steel tube buckling-restrained braces”, M.A. thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015.

[8] Y. Guo and X. Wang, “Bolt connection behavior and design of a four-angle assembled steel buckling-restrained brace: theoretical analysis”, Engineering Mechanics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 56–63, 2014, doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.01.0004.

[9] X. Wang and Y. Guo, “Bolt connection behavior and design of a four-angle assembled steel buckling-restrained brace: numerical analysis”, Engineering Mechanics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 15–24, 2014, doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.01.0005 .

[10] B. Zhu, Y. Guo, and Y. Yuan, “Load-carrying capacity and hysteretic performance of corrugated web connected BRB”, China Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 40–53, 2018, doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2018.02.005.

[11] M. Jia, F. Li, and B. Lu, “Experimental study on assembled buckling-restrained braces wrapped with carbon fiber”, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 98–104, 2016, doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2016.06.016.

[12] GB/T 228-2002 Metallic materials-Tensile testing at ambient temperature. China Architecture & Building Press, 2002.

[13] H. T. Zhao, G. Shi, Y. Gao, “Experimental study on cyclic behaviour of low yield point steel buckling-restrained braces”, Engineering Structures, vol. 277, art. no. 115464, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115464.

[14] J. Z. Tong, E. Y. Zhang, Y. L. Guo, and C. Q. You, “Cyclic experiments and global buckling design of steel-angleassembled buckling-restrained braces”, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 5107–5133,2022, doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01389-w.

[15] L. Gu, X. Gao and J. Xu, “Experimental research on seismic performance of BRB concrete frames”, Journal of Building Structures, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 101–111, 2011, doi: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2011.07.015.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Fang, Yuan, et al. “Experimental of Buckling Restrained Brace Hysteretic Performance With Carbon Fiber Wrapped in Concrete”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 70, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 527-41, doi:10.24425/ace.2024.148926.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.