English
Język Polski
Triple correlation states between in-situ tested soil parameters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2024.150967Abstract
When testing soil parameters, the measured parameter values are only approximations of the true values. The measurand is determined based on metrological uncertainties or using statistical models for analysing data. Some parameters of the soil state present strong correlations, but others do not always provide simple correspondences. Multiple correlations between geotechnical parameters can provide a new perspective regarding the mutual relations between these parameters and may improve the fit of different soil parameters in geotechnical design procedures. Statistical modelling based on observed data generally involves a comparison between theoretical expectancies and practical surveys. Multidimensional regression models are useful for revealing the influences of several independent variables on one dependent variable. Statistical parameters and a quantitative approach can be used to define the relationships between several factors. Presented results claim that triple depended correlations may bring some corrects in relationships of soil parameters as against to double depended correlations. The differences in coefficients of determination are significant. Three variables involved stronger correlations.References
[1] E. Mieloszyk, A. Milewska, and M. Wyroślak, ”Blast Charge Technique as a Method of Soil Improving to Locate the New Supporting Runways”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 603, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/603/5/052025.
[2] M. Pasetto, E. Pasquini, G. Giacomello, and A. Baliello, “Proposal of correlation among different soil bearing capacity parameters based on an extensive test campaign”, in International Conferences on Traffic and Transport Engineering ICTTE. Belgrade, 2018, pp. 577-583. Available: https://arts.units.it/retrieve/handle/11368/2956067/297187/7.pdf.
[3] E. Seyman, “Laboratory evaluation of in-situ tests as potential quality control/quality assurance tools”, M.A. thesis, Louisiana State University, The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2003.
[4] J. Zhang, “Evaluation of mechanistic-based compaction measurements for earthwork QC/QA”, M.A. thesis, Iowa State University, 2010.
[5] JCGM 2008, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008. Available: https://www.bipm.org ›JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
[6] M. Wyroślak, “Establishing Relationships between Parameters of the Controlled Compaction Soil by Using Various In-Situ Tests”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 245, no. 2, art. no. 022041. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/2/022041.
[7] Ch. Zaiontz, Statistics Using Excel Succinctly. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.
[8] S. Brandt, Data Analysis. Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers. Springer International Publishing, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03762-2
[9] A. Milewska, “A solution of non-linear differential problem with application to selected geotechnical problems”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 187-197, 2011. doi: 10.2478/v.10169-011-0014-4
[10] E. Mieloszyk, A. Milewska, and S. Grulkowski, “Safety at railway level crossings and Vision Zero”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 117-132, 2021. doi: 10.24425/ace.2021.137158.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
