Analysis of a data set in a multi-criteria assessment of variants of a building development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2024.151893

Abstract

One of the most important things to do at the stage of preparing an investment process in the construction business is to develop a few possible solutions and then to choose the variant which best fulfils the expectations of various groups of stakeholders. Making a decision about which variant to select depends on how it satisfies a number of criteria, which in turn reflect the requirements set for the planned investment. The process analysing variant solutions employs multi-criteria analysis methods. In order to make analyses and to identify the importance of measurable and non-measurable criteria, surveys and interviews are carried out to acquire the information on the role of the previously defined criteria. Opinions given by experts tend to be divergent due to differences in education, professional background as well as various professional and private experiences. This article reviews data processing methods, and discusses an example of a procedure, which is part of a more extensive analysis of the route of a planned road. The case presented in this paper focuses on the evaluation of five criteria from the category ‘impact on the natural environment’, which are significant in such development projects. The calculations involved in this assessment proved to be time- and labour-consuming, while raising a number of doubts concerning the stage of data aggregation. Hence, the objective of this study has been to develop a method that will enable more efficient data processing while taking into account all assessments.

References

[1] E. Szafranko, “Metody analizy wariantów inwestycji drogowych”, Drogownictwo, no. 1, pp. 18-25, 2014.

[2] E. Szafranko, “Selected problems of the environmental impact analysis of investment projects based on life cycle assessment procedure”, Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 87-94, 2019, doi: 10.12911/22998993/112504.

[3] M. Książek, “Analiza porównawcza wybranych metod wielokryterialnych oceny przedsięwzięć inwestycyjnych”, Budownictwo i Inżynieria Środowiska, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 555-561, 2011.

[4] E. Szafranko, “Wybrane aspekty analiz wielokryterialnych w ocenie rozwiązań konstrukcyjno-materiałowych obiektów budowlanych”, Materiały Budowlane, no. 6, pp. 107-108, 2016, doi: 10.15199/33.2016.06.46.

[5] M. Krzemiński, M. Książek, P. Nowak, J. Rosłon, and T. Wieczorek: “Wielokryterialna ocena wybranych rozwiązań konstrukcyjnych ścian w aspekcie odporności ogniowej”, Logistyka, no. 5, pp. 862-871, 2014.

[6] M. Książek, P. Nowak, S. Kivrak, J. Rosłon, and L. Ustinovichius: “Computer-aided decision-making in construction project development“, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 248-259, 2015, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2014.996250.

[7] S. Brelak and R. Dachowski, “Wielokryterialna analiza porównawcza wyrobów z autoklawizowanego betonu komórkowego modyfikowanego materiałami recyklingowymi”, Budownictwo o Zoptymalizowanym Potencjale Energetycznym, vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 29-36, 2017, doi: 10.17512/bozpe.2017.2.04.

[8] A. Leśniak, “Statistical Methods in Bidding Decision Support for Construction Companies”, Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 13, art. no. 5973, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11135973.

[9] J. Szelka, “Information and decision modelling in civil engineering”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 97-110, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ace.2022.143028.

[10] L. Kanapeckiene, A. Kaklauskas, E. K. Zavadskas, and M. Seniut, “Integrated knowledge management model and system for construction projects”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1200-1215, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.030.

[11] N. Ibadov, J. Kulejewski, and L. Hrischev, “Porządkowanie i wartościowanie kryteriów oceny rozwiązań budowlanych”, Logistyka, no. 6, pp. 1377-1384, 2011.

[12] P. Żabicki and W. Gardziejczyk, “Zagadnienia normalizacji kryteriów w analizach wielokryterialnych w projektowaniu dróg”, Budownictwo i Architektura, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 325-333, 2014.

[13] E. Szafranko, “Ocena ekspertów w analizach prowadzonych metodą AHP przy wyborze wariantów inwestycji”, Inżynieria Morska i Geotechnika, no. 5, pp. 400-404, 2013.

[14] E. Szafranko, “Ocena kryteriów w wielokryterialnych analizach wariantów inwestycji budowlanych”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 205-216, 2016, doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0075.

[15] M. Remlein, “Społecznie odpowiedzialne inwestycje w opinii ekspertów z dziedziny rachunkowości”, Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 153-167, 2019.

[16] M. Mirończuk, “Przegląd i klasyfikacja zastosowań metod oraz technik eksploracji danych”, Studia i Materiały Informatyki Stosowanej, no. 2, pp. 35-46, 2010.

[17] S. Destercke, D. Dubois, and E. Chojnacki, “Possibilistic information fusion using maximal coherent subsets”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2009.

[18] A. Piegat, “Funkcja r1(x) reprezentatywności hipotez i jej zastosowanie do agregacji ocen eksperckich”, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Studia Informatica, vol. 27, 2011.

[19] X. Chen and X. Lin, “Big Data Deep Learning: Challenges and Perspectives”, IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 514-525, 2014, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2325029.

[20] M. Loyola, “Big data in building design: A review”, Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, vol. 23, pp. 259-284, 2018.

[21] J. Harasymiuk, “Environmental impact assessments in investment process – legal and methodological aspects”, Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 79-87, 2019, doi: 10.12911/22998993/112857.

[22] J. Harasymiuk, “Problematyka kwalifikacji inwestycji budowlanych w aspekcie ich uciążliwości dla środowiska”, Budownictwo o Zoptymalizowanym Potencjale Energetycznym, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 117-124, 2019, doi: 10.17512/bozpe.2019.2.13.

[23] J. Harasymiuk and E. Szafranko, “Method of construction projects’ classification for habitat assessment in Poland and the problem of choosing materials solutions”, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, art. no. 4277, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074277.

[24] E. Szafranko and M. Jurczak, “Applicability of a novel Indicator Method to assessment of the impact of buildings on the environment”, Building and Environment, vol. 234, art. no. 110131, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110131.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Jurczak, Marlena Anna, et al. “Analysis of a Data Set in a Multi-Criteria Assessment of Variants of a Building Development”. Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 70, no. 4, Dec. 2024, pp. 291-05, doi:10.24425/ace.2024.151893.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.