Ocena wytrzymałości na ścinanie gruntów z badań in situ w ujęciu regionalnym
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2025.156183Abstrakt
Poprawny opis podłoża jest niezbędny do optymalnego zaprojektowania posadowienia oraz ma praktyczny wymiar ekonomiczny dla wielu problemów projektowania geotechnicznego. Ocena wytrzymałości gruntu wymaga doboru odpowiednich, zestadaryzowanych badań oraz zwalidowanych metod interpretacji, w oparciu o doświadczenia lokalne. Niemniej poprawność wnioskowania w zakresie rozwiązań posadowienia wymaga wypracowania charakterystyki parametrów podłoża budowlanego w podziale na jednostki o zasięgu regionalnym.Wartykule porównano wyniki wytrzymałości na ścinanie gruntów zróżnicowanych lito-genetycznie (między innymi organicznych i makroporowych, pylastych – lessy) uzyskane w trakcie badań laboratoryjnych i terenowych na poletkach badawczych z obszaru Polski. Wybrane podłoża reprezentują osady o różnej litologii, genezie i stopniu przekonsolidowania. Badania obejmowały zarówno badania in situ (sondowania FVT, CPTU i DMT) jak i walidujące badania laboratoryjne. Uzyskane wyniki pozwoliły na zweryfikowanie znanych z literatury współczynników korelacyjnych i wzorów dla określenia parametru cu/Su uzyskiwanego różnymi metodami w ujęciu regionalnym, jako podstawa do wyznaczania wiarygodnych do projektowania parametrów geotechnicznych.Bibliografia
[1] A.W. Skempton, “A History of Soil Properties”, in Proceedings of XI International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 12-16 August 1985, San Francisco, USA, Golden Jubilee Volume. A.A. Balkema, 1985, pp. 1717-1927.
[2] R. Kaczyński, Geological-engineering conditions in Poland. Warsaw: PIG PIB, 2017 (in Polish).
[3] R.J. Chandler, “The in-situ measurement of the undrained shear strength of clays using the field vane”, in Vane Shear Strength Testing in Soils. Field and Laboratory Studies, A.F. Richards, Ed. Philadelphia: ASTM, 1988, pp. 13-44.
[4] R. Roque, N. Janbu, and K. Senneset, “Basic interpretation procedures of flat dilatometer tests”, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1988, pp. 577-588.
[5] T. Lunne, P.K. Robertson, and J.J.M. Powell, Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Blackie Academic & Proffesional, 1997.
[6] S. Marchetti, P. Monaco, G. Totani, and M. Calabrese, The Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT) in Soil Investigations. Report of the ISSMGE Technical Committee 16 on Ground Property Characterisation from In-situ Testing. ISSMGE, 2001.
[7] Z. Frankowski and P. Pietrzykowski, “Geological and geotechnical problems of loess deposits from southeastern Poland”, in Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Conference: Geotechnical challenges in megacities, vol. 2. Moscow, 2010, pp. 546-553.
[8] T. Godlewski and T. Szczepański, “Measurement of soil shear wave velocity using in situ and laboratory seismic methods – some methodological aspects”, Geological Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 358-366, 2015, doi: 10.7306/gq.1182.
[9] T. Godlewski, “Evaluation of stiffness degradation curves from in situ tests in various soil types”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 285-307, 2018, doi: 10.2478/ace-2018-0075.
[10] W. Bogusz and M. Witowski, “Small-strain stiffness of fine-grained soils from Poland based on a laboratory test database”, in Proceedings of the XVII ECSMGE-2019 Geotechnical Engineering foundation of the future, Reykjavik Iceland. Reykjavik: Icelandic Geotechnical Society, 2019, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-0129.
[11] K. Nepelski, T. Godlewski, M. Rudko, and M.Witowski, “Creating of a geotechnical model of the loess subsoil”, Materiały Budowlane, no. 2, pp. 44-47, 2023, doi: 10.15199/33.2023.02.11 (in Polish).
[12] K. Nepelski and A. Lal, “CPT parameters of loess subsoil in Lublin area”, Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11136020.
[13] PN-EN 1997-2:2009 Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design. Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. PKN, 2009 (in Polish).
[14] M. Witowski, K. Zabielska-Adamska, and S. Łukasik, “Stress-Strain Responses of Calcium Fly Ash”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 149, no. 11, pp. 1-18, 2023, doi: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-9968.
[15] M. Tarnawski, Z. Frankowski, T. Godlewski, K. Gwizdała, J. Kłosiński, R. Mieszkowski, A. Nowosad, J. Saloni, A. Słabek, T. Szczepański, M. Ura, J. Wierzbicki, and M. Wójcik, In situ tests of the building ground. Warszawa: PWN, 2020 (in Polish).
[16] PN-B-04452:2002 Geotechnics. Field Tests. PKN, 2002 (in Polish).
[17] PN-EN ISO 22476-9:2021-03 Ground investigation and testing – Field test – Part 9: Field Vane Test (FVT I FVT-F). PKN, 2021 (in Polish).
[18] T. Godlewski and Ł. Kaczyński, “The determination of shear strength of soil based on field vane test in accordance with new European standards”, Scientific Review – Engineering and Environmental Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 356-365, 2016 (in Polish).
[19] Z. Lechowicz, M. Bajda, S. Rabarijoely, and G.Wrzesiński, “Use of SDMT for the evaluation of the geotechnical parameters of organic soils”, in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on CPTU and DMT in soft clays and organic soils. Poznań, 2014, pp. 107-118.
[20] L. Bałachowski, K. Międlarz, and J. Konkol, “Strength parameters of deltaic soils determined with CPTU, DMT and FVT”, in Cone Penetration Testing 2018, M. Hicks, F. Pisanò, and J. Peuchen, Eds. CRC Press, 2018, pp. 117-121.
[21] Z. Młynarek, J. Wierzbicki, and K. Stefaniak, “Interrelationship between undrained shear strength from DMT and CPTU tests for soils of different origin”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 890-901, 2018, doi: 10.1520/GTJ20170365.
[22] Z. Lechowicz, S. Rabarijoely, and T. Kutia, “Determination of undrained shear strength and constrained modulus from DMT for stiff overconsolidated clays”, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Land Reclamation, no. 49 (2), pp. 107-116, 2017, doi: 10.1515/sggw-2017-0009.
[23] J. Wierzbicki, Evaluation of in situ preconsolidation of the subsoil in terms of its genesis. Poznan University of Life Sciences Press, 2010 (in Polish).
[24] T. Godlewski and M. Wszędyrówny-Nast, “Correlations of regional geotechnical parameters on the basis of CPTU and DMT tests”, in Proceeding’s of the 13th Baltic Sea Geotechnical Conference, 22-24.09.2016, Wilno, Litwa. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Press, 2016, pp. 22-27.
[25] Z. Młynarek, J. Wierzbicki, and M. Bogucki, “Geotechnical characterization of peat and gyttja by means of different in-situ tests”, in Proceedings of the XVI ECSMGE Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development. Edinburg: ICE Publishing, 2015, 3097-31.
[26] K. Stefaniak, “Assessment of shear strength in silty soils”, Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 51-55, 2015, doi: 10.1515/sgem-2015-0020.
[27] G. Straż, “Determination of undrained shear strength of selected organic soil on the basis of FVT test”, Journal of Civil Engineering, Environment and Architecture, vol. 34, no. 64, pp. 91-101, 2017 (in Polish).
[28] Z. Lechowicz, M. Fukue, S. Rabarijoely, and M.J. Sulewska, “Evaluation of the Undrained Shear Strength of Organic Soils from a Dilatometer Test Using Artificial Neural Networks”, Applied Science, vol. 8, no. 8, 2018, doi: 10.3390/app8081395.
[29] W. Frikha, Z.B. Salem, and M. Bouassida, “Estimation of Tunis soft soil undrained shear strength from pressuremeter data”, in Proceeding of the Interntional Symposium ISP6. Paris, 2013, pp. 2017-2022.
[30] L. Ménard, “Mesures in situ des propriétés physiques des sols”, Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, vol. 3, pp. 357-376, 1957.
[31] S. Amar and F.J. Jézéquel, “Essais en place et en laboratoire sursols cohérents comparaison des résultats”, Bulletin de liaison deLCPC, Paris, np. 58, pp. 97-108, 1972.
English
Język Polski