Modeling the hydrodynamic interactions between the river morphology and navigation channel operations

Authors

  • Abdel-Mageed Neveen Badawy Benha University, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Department of Civil Engineering, Cairo, Egypt
  • Alaa N. El-Hazek Benha University, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Department of Civil Engineering, Cairo, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0911-4592
  • Hossam Mohamed Elsersawy National Water Research Center, Nile Research Institute, Fum Ismailiya Canal, P.O. Box 74, Shoubra El-Kheima, 13411, Egypt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-6798
  • Ebtesam Rezk Mohammed National Water Research Center, Nile Research Institute, Fum Ismailiya Canal, P.O. Box 74, Shoubra El-Kheima, 13411, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2021.139008

Abstract

The Nile River is the main route for inland navigation in Egypt. The vessels navigating through inland waterways generate complex physical forces that need to be studied extensively. Quantifying the effects of vessels sailing along a waterway is a complex problem because the river flow is unsteady and the river bathymetry is irregular. This paper aims to investigate the hydrodynamic effects resulting from the movement of vessels such as return currents around the vessel, the draw down of the water surface, under keel clearance, and the shear stress induced by vessels operating in the Nile River. Modeling such effects has been performed by applied the two-dimensional ADH (adaptive hydraulics) model to a river reach for different navigation channel operation scenarios. The obtained results show that the draw down heights, the water fluctuation, and the shear stress magnitude are larger when the river cross sectionals are narrow and the shallow water depths. These river sections are considered more disposed to bed erosion and it is morphologically unsafe. The section having the narrowest width and the lowest depth was associated with the largest drawdown percentages of 98.3% and 87.3% in one-way and two-way scenarios. While the section having the widest width and the largest depth was associated with the least drawdown percentages of 48.5% and 51.9% in one-way and two-way scenarios. The section having the narrowest width and the lowest depth was associated with the largest fluctuations of 22.0 cm and 41.9 cm in one-way and two-way scenarios. While the section having the widest width and the largest depth was associated with the least fluctuations of 0.6 cm and 1.8 cm in one-way and two-way scenarios. The section having the narrowest width and the lowest depth was the worst section for under keel clearance of 5.0 cm and 33.3 cm in one-way and two-way scenarios. While the section having the widest width and the largest depth was the best section, where its clearance values were 183.2 cm and 155.0 cm in one-way and two-way scenarios. It is concluded that a numerical model is a valuable tool for predicting and quantifying the hydrodynamic effects of vessels moving through a two-dimensional flow field and can be used to evaluate different scenarios that are difficult to measure in the field or a physical model. Also, it provides visualization products that help us understand the complicated forces produced by vessels moving in a navigation channel.

References

ALTHAGE J. 2010. Ship-induced waves and sediment transport in Göta River, Sweden. MSc Thesis. Lund University pp. 104.

BERGER C., LEE L. 2005. Modeling of vessel effects: the selection of adaption parameters for modeling vessels in ADH [online]. Technical note IX-15. Vicksburg. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center pp. 8. [Access 10.07.2020]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ ADA607401.pdf

DAS S.N., DAS S.K., KARIYA J.N. 2012. Simulation of return flow in restricted navigation channel for barge-tow movements. The Open Ocean Engineering Journal. Vol. 5(1) p. 34–46. DOI 10.2174/1874835X01205010034.

ELSAYED R., NEGM A., ALI K., GHALY S. 2019. Evaluation of the existing Nile River navigation path in the reach from Aswan City to Esna Barrage. The Egyptian International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technology. Vol. 27 p. 1–11.

HAMMACK E.A., SMITH D. S., STOCKSTILL R.L. 2008. Modeling vessel- generated currents and bed shear stresses. Technical note; TR-08-7. Vicksburg. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center.

JICA 2003. Annual report 2003 [online]. Tokyo. Japan International Cooperation Agency. [Access 10.07.2020]. Available at: https:// www.jica.go.jp/english/publications/reports/annual/2003/index. html

JONG DE M.P.C., ROELVINK D., REIJMERINK S.P., BREEDERVELD C. 2013. Numerical modelling of passing-ship effects in complex geometries and on shallow water. In: Smart Rivers. Conference. Liege (BE), Maastricht (NL) 23–27.09.2013, Paper 95 p. 1–7. DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.1776.3049.

MAYNORD S.T. 2003. Ship effects before and after deepening Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory of Sabine-Neches Waterway, Port Arthur, Texas. Technical note; TR-03-15. Vicksburg. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center.

MOUSTAFA M.M., YEHIA W. 2017. Squat assessment for safe navigation of River Nile cruisers. Brodogradnja. Vol. 68(2) p. 1–13. DOI 10.21278/brod68201.

POKREFKE T.J., JR., BERGER R.C., RHEE J.P., MAYNORD S.T. 2003. Tow-induced backwater and secondary channel sedimentation, Upper Mississippi River System. ENV Report 41. Vicksburg. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center.

RACIONERO J.S. 2014. Modelling ship-generated sediment transport in the River Göta Älv [online]. MSc Thesis. Göteborg, Sweden. Chalmers University of Technology. [Access 10.07.2020]. Available at: https://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/ 203326/203326.pdf

SAMUEL M.G. 2014. Limitations of navigation through Nubaria canal, Egypt. Journal of Advanced Research. Vol. 5. No. 2 p. 147–155. DOI 10.1016/j.jare.2013.01.006.

SCHIERECK G.J. 2004. Introduction to bed, bank and shore protection. New ed. London, New York. Spon Press. ISBN 0415331773 pp. 399.

ŠVETAK J. 2001. Ship squat. Promet – Traffic – Traffico. Vol. 13. No. 4 p. 247–251.

TATE J.N., BERGER R.C., ROSS C.G. 2008. Houston–Galveston navigation channels, Texas Project Navigation Channel Sedimentation Study, phase 2. Report TR-08-8. Vicksburg. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center.

VERHEIJ H. 2006. Hydraulic aspects of the Montgomery Canal restoration. Report Q3967. British Waterways, WL / Delft Hydraulics.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Neveen Badawy, Abdel-Mageed, et al. “Modeling the Hydrodynamic Interactions Between the River Morphology and Navigation Channel Operations”. Journal of Water and Land Development, vol. 51, no. 51, Dec. 2021, pp. 1-10, doi:10.24425/jwld.2021.139008.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.