Strategies for disaster management and the role of effective governance in Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2025.153525Abstract
This paper examines the crucial interplay between governance and disaster management in Nepal, a nation frequently assailed by natural disasters such as earthquakes, landslides, and floods. Despite substantial progress in disaster risk reduction (DRR) frameworks, particularly following the devastating 2015 earthquake, challenges persist, primarily due to governance issues. Through a mixed-methods approach involving structured questionnaires and indepth interviews with government officials, local leaders, and non-governmental organisation (NGO) representatives, this study explores the effectiveness of disaster management strategies underpinned by governance practices. The research uncovers significant operational, institutional, and environmental challenges that hinder effective disaster management. Key findings indicate bureaucratic delays, poor coordination, and inadequate resource allocation as major impediments, while community engagement and the integration of local knowledge emerge as critical success factors. Furthermore, the study highlights the adverse effects of governance traps, such as political interference and lack of transparency, which exacerbate the vulnerability of disaster-stricken communities. The paper argues for the necessity of robust governance structures that are transparent, accountable, and inclusive, to enhance disaster resilience and response in Nepal. Recommendations are made for strengthening local capacities, improving inter-agency coordination, and leveraging technology to predict and manage disasters more effectively. By addressing these governance-related issues, Nepal can enhance its disaster preparedness and ensure a more resilient future for its population.References
Ariely, G. (2013) “Public administration and citizen satisfaction with democracy: Cross-sectional evidence,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), pp. 747–766. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501432.
Bankoff, G., Frerks, G. and Hilhorst, D. (2004) Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development, and people. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849771924.
Bhuiyan, S. (2015) “Adapting to climate change in Bangladesh: Good governance barriers,” South Asia Research, 35(3), pp. 349–367. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728015598702.
Choudhury, M-U-I., Uddin, M.S. and Haque, C.E. (2019) “Nature brings us extreme events, some people cause us prolonged sufferings: The role of good governance in building community resilience to natural disasters in Bangladesh,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(2), pp. 1761–1781. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1513833.
Comfort, L. et al. (2010) “Reframing disaster policy: The global evolution of vulnerable communities,” Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 1(1), pp. 39–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.1999.0105.
Dangol, N. and Carrasco, S. (2019) “Residents’ self-initiatives for flood adaptation in informal riverbank settlements of Kathmandu,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 40, 101156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101156.
Doeveren van, V. (2011) “Rethinking good governance: Identifying common principles,” Public Integrity, 13(4), pp. 301–318. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922130401.
Finnigan, G. (no date) The natural environment as a disaster hazard— the growing global health threat. Thesis. Deakin University. Available at: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/66546_f417fi-nalfinnigannaturalenvironment.pdf (Accessed: June 26, 2024).
Government of Nepal, NPC (2015) Post disaster needs assessment: Nepal Earthquake 2015. Vol. A: Key findings. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission. Available at: https://fpi.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/pdna_ne-pal_2015_-_report_0.pdf (Accessed: June 26, 2024).
Haque, C.E. and Uddin, M.S. (2013) “Disaster management discourse in Bangladesh: A shift from post-event response to the preparedness and mitigation approach through institutional partnerships,” in J.P. Tiefenbacher (ed.) Approaches to disaster management – Examining the implications of hazards, emergencies and disasters. London: InTech. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5772/54973.
Horney, J. et al. (2016) “Engaging the public in planning for disaster recovery,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 17, pp. 33–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.011.
Jones, S., Aryal, K. and Collins, A. (2013) “Local-level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal,” Disasters, 37(3), pp. 442–467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12006.
Maskrey, A. (1989) Disaster mitigation: A community-based approach (Development guidelines). Oxford: Oxfam. Available at: https://archive.org/details/disastermitigati0000mask/page/n3/mode/2up (Accessed: June 26, 2024).
Tierney, K. (2012) “Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, pp. 341–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618.
UNDRR (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available at: https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-frame-work-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030 (Accessed: June 26, 2024).
UNDRR (2019) Disaster risk reduction in Nepal: Status report. Bangkok: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available at: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/68257_682306nepaldrmstatusreport.pdf (Accessed: June 26, 2024).
Zhang, W., Xu, X. and Chen, X. (2017) “Social vulnerability assessment of earthquake disaster based on the catastrophe progression method: A Sichuan Province case study,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, pp. 361–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.0
