Opportunities and constraints for effective treatment of domestic wastewater in rural onsite wastewater treatment systems operating in a foothill climate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2025.155319Abstract
This paper presents the results of a study of two innovative quasi-technical installations designed for high-quality treatment of domestic wastewater in rural areas. The installations are equipped with similar technological devices arranged in sequences consisting of: three-chamber flow septic tanks, biological sprayed beds filled with granular (10-20 mm) calcined clay materials, special slope biofilters with soil-grass beds and infiltration ponds as recipients. The sites are located at an altitude of more than 600 m a.s.l. in a foothill climate, in southern Poland. For both sites, the analysis showed a high elimination efficiency for pollutants expressed as biochemical oxygen demand over five days, chemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. In the case of total nitrogen, the reduction rate was 79.4% for facility No. 1 and 84.3% for facility No. 2, respectively. A high level of ammoniacal nitrogen removal was achieved at both analysed sites, at 98.7% for facility No. 1 and 92.1% for facility No. 2. The PO4-P were removed at 88.0% at facility No. 1 and 69.1% at facility No. 2. The correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between the removal efficiency of the analysed pollutant indicators and the temperature of the treated wastewater, with the exception of total nitrogen. Thus, it is concluded that the climatic conditions did not affect the wastewater treatment processes. They are an effective alternative to treatment plants based on activated sludge technology and are recommended for use in rural areas with high environmental values, without sewage systems, which require special protection.References
Bhaskar, K.V. and Charyulu, P.B.B.N (2005) “Effect of environmental factors on nitrifying bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of Setaria italica (L.) Beauv,” African Journal of Biotechnology, 4(10), pp. 1145–1146.
Bugajski, P. et al. (2022) “Reliability and probability of organic and biogenic pollutants removal in a constructed wetland wastewater treatment plant in the aspect of its long-term operation,” Desalination and Water Treatment, 278, pp. 13–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.29051.
Bugajski, P., Chmielowski, K. and Kaczor, G. (2016) “Optimizing the percentage of sewage from septic tanks for stable operation of a wastewater treatment plant,” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(4), pp. 1421–1425. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/62299.
Bugajski, P., Kurek, K. and Jóźwiakowski, K. (2019) “Effect of wastewater temperature and concentration of organic compounds on the efficiency of ammonium nitrogen removal in a household treatment plant servicing a school building,” Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(3), pp. 31–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2019.128638.
Carrera, J., Vicent, T. and Lafuente, F. (2004) “Influence of temperature on denitrification of an industrial high-strength nitrogen waste-water in a two-sludge system,” Water SA, 29(1), pp. 11–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v29i1.4939.
Chen, X. et al. (2017) “Controlling denitrification accompanied with nitrite accumulation at the sediment-water interface,” Ecological Engineering, 100, pp. 194–198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLENG.2016.12.019.
Cooper, P.F. et al. (1996) Reed beds and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Swindon: WRc Publication.
Directive (2024) “Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment,” Official Journal, L. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/3019/oj (Accessed: May 11, 2025).
Dotro, G. et al. (2017) Treatment Wetlands. Vol. 7. Biological Wastewater Treatment Series. London: IWA Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780408774.
Elgood, Z. et al. (2010) “Nitrate removal and greenhouse gas production in a stream-bed denitrifying bioreactor,” Ecological Engineering, 36, pp. 1575–1580. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.011.
Ferrier, D.R. and Chlubek, D. (2018) Biochemia [Biochemistry], 7 edn. Wrocław: Edra Urban & Partner.
Gajewska, M., Obarska-Pempkowiak, H. and Wojciechowska, E. (2010) Hydrofitowe oczyszczanie wód i ścieków [Hydrophyte treatment of water and sewage]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
GUS (2022) Ochrona środowiska 2022 [Environment 2022]. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko-energia/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska-2022,1,23.html (Accessed: May 10, 2025).
Heidrich, Z. and Witkowski, A. (2005) Urządzenia do oczyszczania ścieków [Sewage treatment equipment]. Warszawa: Seidel-Przywecki.
Isteniĉ, D. et al. (2023) “Challenges and perspectives of nature-based wastewater treatment and reuse in rural areas of central and Eastern Europe,” Sustainability, 15(10), 8145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108145.
Jóźwiakowski, K. et al. (2018) “The efficiency and technological reliability of biogenic compounds removal during long-term operation of a one-stage subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland,” Separation and Purification Technology, 202, pp. 216– 226. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.058.
Jucherski, A. (2000) “Wpływ wybranych czynników technicznych na skuteczność oczyszczania ścieków bytowo-gospodarczych w oczyszczalniach roślinno-gruntowo-glebowych w rejonach górzystych [Influence of selected technical factors on the effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment in vegetable and soil type treatment plants in mountainous regions],” Prace Naukowe IBMER, pp. 38–84.
Jucherski, A. and Walczowski, A. (2012) “Quasi-techniczne oczyszczalnie ścieków w ochronie zasobów wody na wiejskich terenach górzystych [Quasi-technical wastewater treatment plants in the protection of water resources in mountainous areas],” Problemy Inżynierii Rolniczej, 3(77), pp. 151–158.
Jucherski, A. and Walczowski, A. (2020) “Ocena funkcjonalna współczesnych rozwiązań technologicznych stosowanych w przydomowych oczyszczalniach ścieków – POŚ do 50 RLM (5 m3/d) [Functional assessment of modern technological solutions used in household wastewater treatment plants up to 50 PE],” in M. Strzelczyk (ed.) Przydomowe oczyszczalnie ścieków w sanitacji terenów wiejskich w Polsce. Rozwiązania techniczne, ocena funkcjonalna, oddziaływanie na środowiska [Household waste-water treatment plants in sanitation of rural areas in Poland. Technical solutions, functional assessment, environmental impact]. Warszawa–Wrocław–Tylicz: Wydawnictwo ITP, pp. 40–84.
Jucherski, A. et al. (2019) “Technological reliability of domestic wastewater purification in a small sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR),” Separation and Purification Technology, 224, pp. 340–347. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.024.
Jucherski, A. et al. (2024) “Reliability of organic and biogenic pollutant removal in selected technologies used in domestic wastewater treatment plants: A comparative analysis,” Journal of Environmental Management, 354, 120381. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120381.
Klimiuk, E. and Łebkowska, M. (2003) Biotechnologia w ochronie środowiska [Biotechnology in environmental protection]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kuczewski, K. and Paluch, J. (1997) Oczyszczanie ścieków bytowo-gospodarczych na terenach wiejskich w oczyszczalniach roślinno-glebowych [Treatment of domestic wastewater in rural areas in plant-soil treatment plants]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu.
McCartney, D.M. and Oleszkiewicz, J.A. (1990) “Carbon and nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor at low temperatures,” Environmental Technology, 11(2), pp. 99–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593339009384844.
Młyński, D. et al. (2020) “Investigation of the wastewater treatment plant processes efficiency using statistical tools,” Sustainability, 12(24), 10522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410522.
Operacz, A. et al. (2023) “Impact of climate conditions on pollutant concentrations in the effluent from a one-stage constructed wetland: A case study,” Sustainability, 15(17), 13173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713173.
Paredes, D. et al. (2007) “New aspects of microbial nitrogen transformations in the context of wastewater treatment – A review,” Engineering in Life Sciences, 7(1), pp. 13–25.
Pawęska, K. et al. (2011) “Osadnik gnilny – podstawowy element przydomowej oczyszczalni ścieków [Septic tank – basic element of household treatment plant],” Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 10, pp. 43–53.
Philip, H. et al. (1993) “Septic tank sludges: Accumulation rate and biochemical characteristics,” Water Science & Technology, 28(10), pp. 57–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1993.0205.
PN-72/C-04559/02. Woda i ścieki – Badania zawartości zawiesin – Oznaczanie zawiesin ogólnych, mineralnych i lotnych metodą wagową [Suspension content testing – Determination of total, mineral and volatile suspensions by gravimetric method]. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny.
Pochana, K. and Keller, J. (1999) “Study of factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND),” Water Science & Technology, 39(6) pp. 61–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00123-7.
Rodziewicz, J. et al. (2020) “Biofilter with innovative filling for low-temperature treatment of sewage from deicing airport runways,” Separation and Purification Technology, 242, 116761, pp. 1575–1580. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116761.
Rostron, W.M., Stuckey, D.C. and Young, A.A. (2001) “Nitrification of high strength ammonia wastewaters: Comparative study of immobilisation media,” Water Research, 35(5), pp. 1169–1178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00365-1.
Rozporządzenie (2019) “Rozporządzenie Ministra Gospodarki Morskiej i Żeglugi Śródlądowej z dnia 12 lipca 2019 r. w sprawie substancji szczególnie szkodliwych dla środowiska wodnego oraz warunków, jakie należy spełnić przy wprowadzaniu do wód lub do ziemi ścieków, a także przy odprowadzaniu wód opadowych lub roztopowych do wód lub urządzeń wodnych [Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 12 July 2019 on substances particularly harmful to the aquatic environment and the conditions to be met when discharging sewage into waters or soil, as well as when discharging rainwater or meltwater into waters or into water devices],” Dz. U. 2019 poz. 1311. Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20190001311 (Accessed: May 11, 2025).
Stanisz, A. (2006) Przystępny kurs statystyki z zastosowaniem STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny [An accessible course in statistics using STATISTICA PL with medical examples]. Kraków: StatSoft Publishing.
Steinhoff-Wrześniewska, A. et al. (2020) “Charakterystyka technologiczno-lokalizacyjna obiektów badawczych [Technological and location characteristics of research facilities],” in M. Strzelczyk (ed.) Przydomowe oczyszczalnie ścieków w sanitacji terenów wiejskich w Polsce. Rozwiązania techniczne, ocena funkcjonalna, oddziaływanie na środowiska [Household wastewater treatment plants in sanitation of rural areas in Poland. Technical solutions, functional assessment, environmental impact]. Warszawa–Wrocław–Tylicz: Wydawnictwo ITP, pp. 127–134.
Vacková, L. et al. (2011) “Comparison of denitrification at low temperature using encapsulated Paracoccus denitrificans, Pseudomonas fluorescens and mixed culture,” Bioresource Technology, 102(7), pp. 4661–4666. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.024.
Young, B. et al. (2017) “Low temperature MBBR nitrification: micro-biome analysis,” Water Research, 111. pp. 224–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.050.
