Evaluation of selected feed parameters of grapevine leaves using the near infrared spectroscopy method

Authors

  • Tomasz Horaczek Institute of Technology and Life Sciences – National Research Institute, Falenty, Al. Hrabska 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland
  • Magdalena Kapłan University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Lublin, Poland
  • Kamila Klimek University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Institute of Horticulture Production, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
  • Anna Borkowska University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Institute of Horticulture Production, 28 Głęboka St, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
  • Ferah Yilmaz Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Fethiye Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, TR-48300 Fethiye Mugla, Turkey
  • Jerzy Barszczewski Institute of Technology and Life Sciences – National Research Institute, Falenty, Al. Hrabska 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland
  • Kamil Buczyński University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Lublin, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2025.156050

Abstract

In the face of increasing demand for food and limited natural resources, agriculture faces great challenges, including the need to find alternative sources of feed for livestock. One promising solution is the use of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) leaves, which are a by-product of the wine industry. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the chemical composition of the leaves of four grape cultivars (‘Regent’, ‘Rondo’, ‘Seyval Blanc’, ‘Solaris’) and to assess their potential as feed for livestock. The research was carried out at the Nobilis vineyard in the Sandomierska Upland. Leaf biometric and quality parameters such as leaf area, mass of 1 leaf, number of leaves per shoot, number of lignified shoots per bush and content of moisture, protein, fibre, ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), organic matter (OM) and dry matter (DM) digestibility and total sugars were analysed. The results showed significant differences between cultivars. ‘Solaris’ had the highest area (1.27 m2) and leaf mass (0.0086 kg), which may suggest its higher potential as a feedstock. ‘Seyval Blanc’ had the smallest leaves but the highest number of leaves per shoot and per 1 ha area, which may be beneficial for crop intensification. The ‘Rondo’ and ‘Regent’ cultivars stood out for their high protein content and digestibility, making them a valuable feed ingredient. ‘Regent’ also contained the highest soluble sugar content (7.59%). The use of vine leaves as feed can help reduce waste in wine production, support sustainable agriculture and improve the quality of feed for livestock.

References

Albergamo, A. et al. (2020) “Grape water: Reclaim and valorization of a by-product from the industrial cryoconcentration of grape (Vitis vinifera) must,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(7), pp. 2971–2981. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10326.

Alibaş, İ. (2014) “Microwave, air and combined microwave-air drying of grape leaves (Vitis vinifera L.) and the determination of some quality parameters,” International Journal of Food Engineering, 10(1), pp. 69–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2012-0037.

Birkinshaw, A. et al. (2022) “Effects of early herbage cutting and vine leaves on methane emission, urine nitrogen losses, and the milk fatty acid profile of dairy cows,” Journal of Dairy Science, 105(9), pp. 7416–7431. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21458.

Bordiga, M. (ed.) (2016) Valorization of wine making by-products. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Brenes, A. et al. (2016) “Use of polyphenol-rich grape by-products in monogastric nutrition. A review,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, 211, pp. 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2015.09.016.

Buttaro, D. et al. (2015) “Erratum to: Simple and accurate allometric model for leaf area estimation in Vitisvinifera L. genotypes,” Photosynthetica. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0134-1.

Costa, M.M. et al. (2022) “Grape by-products as feedstuff for pig and poultry production,” Animals, 12(17), 2239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12172239.

Dame-Korevaar, A. et al. (2021) “Microbial health hazards of recycling food waste as animal feed,” Future Foods, 4, 100062. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100062.

Doymaz, İ. (2012) “Air-drying characteristics, effective moisture diffusivity and activation energy of grape leaves,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 36, pp. 161–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2011.00557.x.

Erinle, T.J. and Adewole, D.I. (2022) “Fruit pomaces – their nutrient and bioactive components, effects on growth and health of poultry species, and possible optimization techniques,” Animal Nutrition, 9, pp. 357–377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.11.011.

Gąsior, R. (2013) “Wielkość błędów w analizie pasz metodą NIRS i metodą chemiczną [The magnitude of errors in feed analysis using the NIRS method and the chemical method],” Pasze Przemysłowe, 1, p. 44.

Goicoechea, N. et al. (2021) “Assessment of nutritional and quality properties of leaves and musts in three local Spanish grapevine varieties undergoing controlled climate change scenarios,” Plants, 10(6), 1198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061198.

Gürsoy, E. (2023) “Potential feeding value, feed quality, microbial protein production, and anti-methanogenic properties of tree leaves admixed with Italian ryegrass at different ratios using in vitro gas production,” South African Journal of Animal Science, 53(4), Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v53i4.09.

Henchion, M. et al. (2021) “Review: Trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins,” Animal, 15(suppl. 1), 100287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100287.

Intrigliolo, D.S. and Castel, J.R. (2010) “Response of grapevine cv. ‘Tempranillo’ to timing and amount of irrigation: water relations, vine growth, yield and berry and wine composition,” Irrigation Science, 28, pp. 113–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0164-1.

Karan, H. and Basbag, M. (2022) “Elazığ İli Hal Köyü’nde Hayvan Yemi Olarak Kullanılan Farklı Tür Ağaç Yapraklarının (Gazellerin) Yem Kalite Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması [Comparison of feed quality characteristics of different species of tree leaves used as animal feed in Elazig province Hal village],” Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 34, pp. 923–931. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.1100543.

Kazemi, M. and Bezdi, K.G. (2022) “The nutritional value of some fruit tree leaves for finishing lambs,” Animal Biotechnology, 33, pp. 1296–1307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1891929.

Klimek, K.E., Kapłan, M. and Maj, G. (2023) “The evaluation of energy from grape vine shoots used as biomass depending on the cultivar,” Journal of Water and Land Development, 58, pp. 120– 128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.146604.

Kocadayioğulları F., Boğa M. and Ermetin, O. (2024) “Nutrient composition and metabolic energy of different fruit tree leaves as feeding sources for ruminants,” Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 21(3), pp. 816–829. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3601387 (Accessed: July 01, 2025).

Kok, D. et al. (2007) “Short communication. Forage and nutritive values of the pruning residues (leaves plus summer lateral shoots) of four grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars at grape harvest and two post-harvest dates. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, pp. 517–521. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2007054-287.

Maia, M. et al. (2021) “More than just wine: The nutritional benefits of grapevine leaves,” Foods, 10, 2251. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102251.

Marchi de, M. et al. (2007) “Use of near-infrared spectroscopy for assessment of beef quality traits,” Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6(suppl. 1), pp. 421–423. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.

Moldovan, M.L. et al. (2020) “Phytochemical profile and biological activities of tendrils and leaves extracts from a variety of Vitis vinifera L.,” Antioxidants, 9, 373. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9050373.

Pantelić, M.M. et al. (2017) “Phenolic profiles, antioxidant activity and minerals in leaves of different grapevine varieties grown in Serbia,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 62, pp. 76–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2017.05.002.

Partyka, M. (2020) “Biogospodarka w aspekcie wykorzystania największej ilości zasobów – ocena jakości wybranych produktów z konopi na podstawie badań laboratoryjnych [Bioeconomy in the context of maximizing resource utilization – evaluation of the quality of selected hemp products based on laboratory analyses],” in D. Bedla and J. Szarek (eds.) Biogospodarka, aspekty społeczne, instytucjonalne i produkcyjne [Bioeconomy, social, institutional and production aspects]. Tyniec: Wydawnictwo Benedyktynów.

Peiretti, P.G. and Tassone, S. (2019) “Nutritive value of leaves and pruning residues of red and white grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties,” in J. Estrada (ed.) Grapevines at a glance. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publ. Inc., pp. 111–126.

Peng, X. et al. (2023) “Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: A review,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21, pp. 765–801. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01551-5.

Rasool, K. et al. (2023) “Comprehensive insights into sustainable conversion of agricultural and food waste into microbial protein for animal feed production,” Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 22, pp. 527–562. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09651-6.

Romero, M.J. et al. (2000) “Digestibility and voluntary intake of vine leaves (Vitis vinifera L.) by sheep,” Small Ruminant Research, 38(2), pp. 191–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00157-7.

Simbaya, J., Chibinga, O. and Salem, A.Z. (2020) “Nutritional evaluation of selected fodder trees: Mulberry (Molus alba Lam.), Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala Lam de Wit.) and Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) as dry season protein supplements for grazing animals,” Agroforestry Systems, 94, pp. 1189–1197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00504-7.

Spigno, G., Marinoni, L. and Garrido, G.D. (2017) “State of the art in grape processing by-products,” in C.M. Galanakis (ed.) Handbook of grape processing by-products. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 1–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809870-7.00001-6.

UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: United Nations. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (Accessed: September 12, 2025).

Wadhwa, M., Bakshi, M. and Makkar, H. (2015) “Waste to worth: Fruit wastes and by-products as animal feed,” CABI Reviews, 2015, pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201510031.

Workman, J. and Weyer, L. (2012) Practical guide and spectral atlas for interpretive near-infrared spectroscopy. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11894.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Horaczek, Tomasz, et al. “Evaluation of Selected Feed Parameters of Grapevine Leaves Using the Near Infrared Spectroscopy Method”. Journal of Water and Land Development, vol. 67, no. 67, Dec. 2025, pp. 177-82, doi:10.24425/jwld.2025.156050.

Issue

Section

Articles