Optimization of Rotary Degassing Parameters to Improve Melt Cleanliness and Mechanical Properties in A356 Aluminum Alloy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24425/afe.2026.157997Abstract
Melt cleanliness is a critical factor that directly affects the quality of aluminum castings and becomes even more significant in recycling-oriented production, where high scrap utilization is inevitable. Increasing the proportion of scrap intensifies the risk of oxide films, inclusions, and gas porosity in the molten metal; therefore, efficient refining techniques are essential. In this study, the effects of rotary degassing parameters—including rotor speed, rotation time, and gas flow rate—on melt cleanliness of A356 aluminum alloy were systematically investigated. Experimental melts containing 20% primary and 80% scrap aluminum were treated under various degassing conditions using a commercial flux cleaning flux. Characterization was performed through the Reduced Pressure Test (RPT), bifilm index analysis, fluidity measurements, microstructural examinations, and mechanical testing (tensile test and Brinell hardness measurement). The results demonstrated that increasing the rotor speed from 200 rpm to 500 rpm significantly reduced both the density and bifilm indices, indicating a notable improvement in melt cleanliness. Furthermore, higher gas flow rate (10 L/min) and longer rotation time (10 min) provided additional but secondary improvements. Consequently, the optimization of rotary degassing parameters enhanced not only melt quality but also tensile strength and ductility. These findings offer practical insights for optimizing process control in recycling-based aluminum foundries.
References
[1] Campbell, J. (2015). Complete casting handbook: metal casting processes, metallurgy, techniques and design. Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63509-9.00016-9
[2] Kutsal, U., Colak, M. & Ertugrul, O. (2025). Relationship between aluminum liquid metal quality and defects. International Journal of Metalcasting. 20, 2080-2095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-025-01733-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-025-01733-1
[3] Rooy, E.L. (1990). Introduction to aluminum and aluminum alloys. In ASM Handbook Committee (Eds.) Properties and selection: nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials (pp. 3-14). ASM International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v02.a0001057
[4] Chen, W.F., Lui, E.M. (2005). Handbook of structural engineering. CRC press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039931
[5] Padamata, S.K., Yasinskiy, A. & Polyakov, P. (2021). A review of secondary aluminum production and its byproducts. The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS). 73(9), 2603-2614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04802-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04802-y
[6] Zhu, S., Gao, C., Song, K., Chen, M., Wu, F. & Li, X. (2022). An assessment of environmental impacts and economic benefits of multiple aluminum production methods. Journal of Cleaner Production. 370, 133523, 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133523
[7] Dispinar, D. (2006). Determination of metal quality of aluminium and its alloys. Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham.
[8] Durmuş, M., Dispinar, D., Gavgali, M., Uslu, E. & Çolak, M. (2025). Evaluation of Fe content on the fluidity of A356 aluminum alloy by new fluidity index. International Journal of Metalcasting. 19(3), 1590-1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-024-01396-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-024-01396-4
[9] Kaufman, J.G., Rooy, E.L. (2004). Aluminum alloy castings: properties, processes, and applications. ASM International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.tb.aacppa.9781627083355
[10] Chiesa, F., Regimbal, P. (2001). Distinguishing microporosity from macroshrinkage when modeling solidification of A 356 castings. In Transactions of the American Foundry Society and the One Hundred Fifth Annual Castings Congress (pp. 1-11).
[11] Dispinar, D. & Campbell, J. (2011). Porosity, hydrogen and bifilm content in Al alloy castings. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 528(10-11), 3860-3865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.084
[12] Yüksel, Ç., Aybarc, U., Erzi, E., Dispinar, D., Cigdem, M. (2019, February). Melt cleaning efficiency of various fluxes for A356 alloy. In Shape Casting: 7th International Symposium Celebrating Prof. John Campbell's 80th Birthday (pp. 273-280). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06034-3_26
[13] Hudson, S.W. & Apelian, D. (2016). Inclusion detection in molten aluminum: current art and new avenues for in situ analysis. International Journal of Metalcasting. 10(3), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-016-0030-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-016-0030-x
[14] Uslu, E., Dağ, M.M. & Çolak, M. (2023). Design and manufacturing of reduced pressure test machine for determination of liquid aluminum quality in casting. Turkish Journal of Electromechanics and Energy. 8(3), 85-89.
[15] Vijayan, V., Shetty, A., Hiremath, S., Kumar, P. & HM, V. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of cooling curves, fluidity, inclusions, porosity, and microstructure of NaCl-KCl-NaF flux treated Al-12Si alloy. Materials Research Express. 10(12), 126506, 1-12. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ad135b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad135b
[16] Djurdjević, M.B., Odanović, Z. & Pavlović-Krstić, J. (2010). Melt quality control at aluminum casting plants. Metallurgical & Materials Engineering. 16(1), 63-76.
[17] Tigli, A., Tokatli, M., Uslu, E., Colak, M. & Dispinar, D. (2023). Correlation between K-value, density index and bifilm index in determination of liquid Al cleanliness. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 23(3), 22-29. DOI: 10.24425/afe.2023.144311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/afe.2023.144311
[18] Brůna, M. & Sládek, A. (2011). Hydrogen analysis and effect of filtration on final quality of castings from aluminium alloy AlSi7Mg0, 3. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 11(1), 5-10.
[19] Ni, H., Sun, B., Jiang, H. & Ding, W. (2003). Effects of rotating impeller degassing on microstructure and mechanical properties of the A356 scraps. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 352(1-2), 294-299. ISSN (1897-3310). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00900-0
[20] Rathinasuriyan, C., Karthik, K. & Sridhar, K. (2023). Investigation of degassing on aluminum alloy by rotatory impeller degasser. Materials Today: Proceedings. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.263
[21] Di Sabatino, M., Arnberg, L., Rørvik, S. & Prestmo, A. (2005). The influence of oxide inclusions on the fluidity of Al–7 wt.%Si alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 413-414, 272-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.175
[22] Lazaro-Nebreda, J., Patel, J. B. & Fan, Z. (2021). Improved degassing efficiency and mechanical properties of A356 aluminium alloy castings by high shear melt conditioning (HSMC) technology. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 294, 117146, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117146
[23] Mostafaei, M., Ghobadi, M., Eisaabadi B, G., Uludağ, M. & Tiryakioğlu, M. (2016). Evaluation of the effects of rotary degassing process variables on the quality of A357 aluminum alloy castings. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 47(6), 3469-3475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0786-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0786-7
[24] Bogdanoff, T., Tiryakioğlu, M., Liljenfors, T., Jarfors, A. E., Seifeddine, S. & Ghassemali, E. (2023). On the effectiveness of rotary degassing of recycled Al-Si alloy melts: The effect on melt quality and energy consumption for melt preparation. Sustainability. 15(6), 5189, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065189
[25] Gyarmati, G., Vincze, F., Fegyverneki, G., Kéri, Z., Mende, T. & Molnár, D. (2022). The effect of rotary degassing treatments with different purging gases on the double oxide-and nitride film content of liquid aluminum alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 53(2), 1244-1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02414-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02414-0
[26] Podaril, M., Prášil, T., Majernik, J., Kampf, R., Socha, L., Gryc, K. & Gráf, M. (2022). Aluminum melt degassing process evaluation depending on the design and the degree of the FDU unit graphite rotor wear. Materials. 15(14), 4924, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144924
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Archives of Foundry Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
